I've been expecting this. Too bad I was right.
Malcolm was first to cry 'foul'. I said I did not see it, and asked for specifics. You dodged the issue.
Then I see Malcolm cross the line (MY call - no appeal) and point it out.
And we end up in a fur ball.
***
Malcolm, it's too bad you didn't point to that example (that you used a few posts up from here) back when I asked for specifics. I would have ruled that it was VERY close to the line, but given the context of his statement still in bounds. However, I would have cautioned him anyway.
It is always best to avoid talking about the person. Or their motives. Or their parents. Or their education.
TALK ABOUT THEIR IDEAS. THEIR THEORIES. THEIR GUESSES.
***
So, both of you stop this now.
Malcolm - you go first. That is an order.
Just stop. Rich, this means you got to have the last word. But that has already happened.
Let it rest until Monday. OK guys? I'll remove the tire boot then.
*** Edit by your Moderator God
(Yeah, even though the topic is locked, I can still get in. Cool, huh?)
Malcolm: I see you as an instigator type of person. You promised startling PROOF, but didn't deliver. The you did it again. And again. It became irritating.
Rich: never the less, I'm disappointed in your participation here. He baited you (us actually), and you fell for it.
Monday.
