The implications of finding absolute proof.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22561 by Marsevidence01
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[Malcolm] "So for now, why don't you take a respite and go work on your other debunking (or whatever it is that you do) ..."</b>

You are making comments about the poster, rather than what he posted.

Please stop.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Larry, this goes two ways. Then please ask RD to do the same. This comment was demeaning and insinuating and a cheap shot!
Thank you

<i>Here's what I think. I think you're spending so much time talking about this stuff, and you have so much vested in the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, that you've lost track of what you're doing along the way.</i>

[/quote]
RD

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22399 by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
Malcolm,

I'm ending this debate right now. Anytime I take a person right up to the water, and they refuse to drink, I know from years of experience doing this, that it's no longer in the realm of something I can work with.

The last demo I did was so self-evident that if you can't agree with something like that, you're never going to agree on the more subtle stuff. I even included links right to the HiRise images to see with your own eyes.

So, it's pointless.

Have fun!

rd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22400 by Marsevidence01
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br /><b>[Malcolm] "So for now, why don't you take a respite and go work on your other debunking (or whatever it is that you do) ..."</b>

You are making comments about the poster, rather than what he posted.

Please stop.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Larry, this goes two ways. Then please ask RD to do the same. This comment was demeaning and insinuating and a cheap shot!
Thank you

<i>Here's what I think. I think you're spending so much time talking about this stuff, and you have so much vested in the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, that you've lost track of what you're doing along the way.</i>

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
RD

Malcolm Scott
[/quote]

In pont of fact Larry, I ask the moderators on this board to <u>request a formal appology </u>for this comment. This is the kind of insulting comment that I feel must be controlled.

To suggest or otherwise insinuate that I am somehow researching this work for personal profit is unconscionable!

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22401 by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
My report on all images posted here so far?

Pure classic pareidolia (modern). Textbook stuff. Loads of faces. 3D makes it more likely you will find faces of all kinds. Is it a good collection of pareidolia (modern)? Yes, outstanding. Does it show anything that would remotely lead one to believe these are artworks?

No.

rd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22562 by Marsevidence01
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />My report on all images posted here so far?

Pure classic pareidolia (modern). Textbook stuff. Loads of faces. 3D makes it more likely you will find faces of all kinds. Is it a good collection of pareidolia (modern)? Yes, outstanding. Does it show anything that would remotely lead one to believe these are artworks?

No.

rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

And your <i>report</i> as you put it, is the <i>"authority"</i> on the subject? No sir, this IS just your opinion, nothing more and nothing less.

Malcolm Scott

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #22278 by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br /> No sir, this IS just your opinion, nothing more and nothing less.

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Exactly!

Ditto!

rd

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.354 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum