The implications of finding absolute proof.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />There is also nothing ad-hominem about this:

Pay particular attention to Number 4 and the list of uses.

Full Definition of RELIGION

1
a : the state of a religious &lt;a nun in her 20th year of religion&gt;
b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance

2
: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

3
archaic : scrupulous conformity : conscientiousness

<b>***4
: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith***This one. </b>

religionless adjective
See religion defined for English-language learners
See religion defined for kids

Examples of RELIGION

Many people turn to religion for comfort in a time of crisis.
There are many religions, such as Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism.
Shinto is a religion that is unique to Japan.
Hockey is a religion in Canada.
Politics are a religion to him.
Where I live, high school football is religion.
Food is religion in this house.

rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Please let us move on...

Really, my concern here is the following:

As a result of reverting the two stereo files back into the positive, when prepared to view the files in their intended "stereo 3D anaglyph mode" the resulting image showed a remarkably different "concave topography" which showed great detail. In this view, (as I have shown) there are many caverns and apparent strange and compelling artifacts "inside" the said caves.

As of this moment, we have not addressed these "concave" undulations on the premise that the method of "light balance" i.e. inversion factor was fabricated rendering further analysis "null and void".

Malcolm Scott

They're sending in the Heli-vacs now as we speak.

rd
[/quote]

Well, whatchagot?

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />As of this moment, we have not addressed these "concave" undulations on the premise that the method of "light balance" <b>i.e. inversion factor was fabricated rendering further analysis "null and void".</b>

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Right. You have interpreted my response correctly.

rd

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />As of this moment, we have not addressed these "concave" undulations on the premise that the method of "light balance" <b>i.e. inversion factor was fabricated rendering further analysis "null and void".</b>

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Right. You have interpreted my response correctly.

rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

OK got it, so what was the response from HiRISE?


Malcolm Scott

Malcolm Scott
[/quote]Right. You have interpreted my response correctly.

rd
[/quote]

Sorry presuming here...did you get response from HiRISE? Perhaps that was my mistake, I thought you contacted them on this issue.

Malcolm Scott

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />As of this moment, we have not addressed these "concave" undulations on the premise that the method of "light balance" <b>i.e. inversion factor was fabricated rendering further analysis "null and void".</b>

Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Right. You have interpreted my response correctly.

rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Malcolm Scott
[/quote]Right. And you are claiming this is a negative.

When I prove to you that it's not a negative, how will that change your thinking?

rd
[/quote]

I now pose the same question to you?

Malcolm Scott