EXISTENCE (not creation) Ex Nihilo

Hmmmmm interesting. I've never felt so welcome.
Can anyone tell that I'm serious that existence is the definition of nothing through a conceptual geometric embodiment?
I'll call it {{{{{The Conceptual Geometric Embodiment Theory}}}}}.
All in Nothing.

It would seem I can't spark even a mild bit of curiosity from those in this forum. Opting out of this particular discussion is obviously the only recourse.

Carry on.

<font size="6">Hello</font id="size6"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="5">Hello</font id="size5"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="4">Hello</font id="size4"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="3">Hello</font id="size3"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="2">Hello</font id="size2">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="1">Hello .....</font id="size1">

<font size="6">Anybody there</font id="size6"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="5">there</font id="size5"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="4">there</font id="size4"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="3">there</font id="size3"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="2">there</font id="size2">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="1">there .....???</font id="size1">

Dern-it-all Skarp, see what you've done. You went and got all serious and scared everybody off . . .

Well

You could always discuss.
{{{{{{{{The Conceptual Geometric Embodiment Theory.}}}}}}}
It's actually quite self explanatory.

<i>Originally posted by Skarp</i>
<br />Well

You could always discuss.
{{{{{{{{The Conceptual Geometric Embodiment Theory.}}}}}}}
It's actually quite self explanatory.
____________________________________________________________________

Skarp

how about this,read the pages from "Broken Circle" which will lead to topic "Creation Ex Nihilo" on this site, then perhaps you will understand why nobody is responding to you.

North
Perhaps you can explain this from the broken circle thread. It's from one of your post.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">first,although absolute nothingness can exist conceptually, it is not possible in reality because absolute substance exists.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I'm taking it that you agree with me in at least some way when I say Conceptual Geometric Embodiment. It's really not that much of a stretch to say that all things are conceptual in nature, and those things are made of nothing as oppose to something. In fact one would expect this when non-existence is conceptualized. If I drive into a bridge abutment with a Buick Skylark at 60 MPH - I can explain the result every bit as much through conceptual means as the well known physical explanation. The only difference in the result is that of physical verses conceptual. If a conceptual entity acts in accordance with known physical laws - How are we to know physical verses conceptual?

Skarp(i have to do this quickly i'm going to work)

did you read it all(broken circle etc.) don't just pick out what you want,read carefully and think about what i have said above. think about the difference between reality and concept.