Broken Circle

Tom,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>Note that each of "Meta's" posts have been of the same immature, antagonistic type. The poster is a kid or a troll.</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

ANS: Thanks for the heads up. I hadn't read any of his other posts. But I actually think the problem is more ego orientated than antagonistic. I was working on another post when I came back and saw your post above.

Have a look at it. He in fact makes a simular claim of reading on hs web site and does infact have a massive collection of material by other authors. What I don't see is any paper by him on any technical subject. I do see some ominus signs in some of the material he has archived as being required to "Find the truth".

Ans "Yes", I believe after this post I will ignore him.


Meta,

<font color="yellow">I have taken a brief journey to your site. I see you make the claim of reading 6 books every day (365 days per year for 18.5 years). Pardon me if I find that claim less than believable. It borders on outrageous but that is another issue. Just as you don't know me, I don't know you but I must judge you by invoking some logic and common sense and your claims tell me I must use extreme caution when considering anything you might say.</font id="yellow">

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>******************* From Your Site *********************
I've thumbed through and read in detail, about 6 books a day x 365 = 2,195 books a year x 18.5 years = 39,510 books, plus all World Bibles, all religious document finds such as the Nag Hammadi and Kaballah, all Scientific American Magazine archives from 1946 to 1998, innumerable Scientific Journals to 1998, related, archived Nasa documents to 1998, all related, archived microfiche documents from NASA indexes to 1998 and all relevant, archived past, bound magazines and internet documents relating to science, religion, metaphysics, esoterics and even occult, selecting what I considered facts and conclusions, and am still studying internet documents for updating, 6 years after finishing the book reading. I have a saying: "If it's there, I'll find it and read it".
**************************************************************</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">


<font color="yellow"> You state above that your archives are of those things you found to be factual and are a collection which (based on your unique ability to descern) represents a path to the truth. You have put forth such great effort to compile for us only those documents that we need to read and know the truth. I saw the following in your collection regarding "gravity and heat". Which goes to my point about not how much you read but what you read.</font id="yellow">

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>******************* From your Site ********************

Aside from the political controversy and personal arguments surrounding this story, Earthfiles reports an incident involving both heat and a levitation phenomena. A Brazilian man, sleeping in his bed, reportedly is lifted up off the bed and through the roof of his home and returned. The garments he wore for bed, were burned, but he was unharmed: ******************************************************************</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

<font color="yellow">This seemingly has meaning to you. (In all fairness to you I will admit here that I also saw many documents listed that I too have read and consider valid or at least worth considering further and researching.) But I also must say that I see a lot of mumbo jumbo garbage that is anything but science and that has great meaning to me.

It light of your personal attack on me, this is laughable.

The simple fact is that I made a Priori Prediction about "Gravity and Heat" of massive bodies in 1954. 10 years before it was infact measured by NASA in 1964.

I also predicted they would find the expansion of the universe was accelerating. That Priori was a mere 35 years in advance of scientific findings.

I predicted FTL objects would be found. Again a mere 40 years before they were.

I predicted that in deep space the formula D = V x T would be found to be invalid. The anomoly of the Pioneer and other deep space craft seem to be verifying that now (although science has not yet come to the understanding I reached almost a half century ago) and several years before Sputnik.

In my work I also made several other predictions which have been found true. So you can claim you have read a million books but I must ask you "How many Priori Predictions Have You Made?"

There is indeed a difference in reading what somebodyelse says and thinking for oneself. Your tone does not set well with me and I may well place you on "Ignore" on this MSB.</font id="yellow">

"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

ok look folks, every single number is a part of infinity. Just because something had a beginning does not mean it will have an end, and therefore it will become infinite. Of course, we will never REACH that point of infinite, because infinite is ever going. But I personally believe that somehow, somewhere the universe began from nothing, and depending on what the circumstances of nothingness were, sure it could be possible. Will it ever return to nothingness and start over? Hell, maybe it will or maybe it won't. Now, I personally find it hard to understand how something can just exist forever without ever being created. See, with 123's comment on conditions for nothingness being the condition for somethingness, makes sense. Stuff doesn't just HAPPEN, it has a reason. Now, the one thing to that is that if you look at it from a grander scale, if nothingness was the correct conditions for somethingness, then hell, nothingness didn't even last an instance of time and therefore, the universe IS and has existed infinitely through time. (Just some food for thought)

Marks of wisdom can come from even the most unlikely sources.

Origin,

and therefore it will become infinite.[UnQuote]

This phrase tends to suggest a predetermined conclusion. If you meant to be properly critical it should read:

"and therefore it could become infinite."

"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

Origin,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Now, I personally find it hard to understand how something can just exist forever without ever being created. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Just take some time to get used the idea, but it will feel natural eventually.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Stuff doesn't just HAPPEN, it has a reason. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

That is why there can be no beginning.

origin

when you say "there must be a reason",i disagree.
that is the beauty of nature, it does not "need" a reason to do anything,it just does because it can.

and i figure that this nothing was well,always something!!and it seems to me that the deeper we look we always seem to find that what we call nothing at some point in time is actually something in the end.

north, if you look hard enough, nature follows various patterns. That is how we are able to tell, with some degree of certainty, when storms will hit and where. That is how we know how to react to certain animals in various situations (though it's not always the case, because every animal is different).

Marks of wisdom can come from even the most unlikely sources.