Antigravity Research

All this is interesting, but it blows my mind how some of you seem to think what you present is "absolute fact" and not in my view just speculation

"It is important to know what we do not know" (and admit it)

Alan

I feel as if I am a small boy holding but a teaspoon of knowledge standing before the Infinity Ocean of all knowledge

Sorry Alan I understand your frustration with my bold insights, however science has failed to ask the right questions and the dogma [of mythological proportions] piled on top of dogma has brought about a whole lot of wrong answers. I read all of your posts and much of what you and most of our leaders in science are saying is based on a hierarchy of assumptions that cannot be justified by simple logic. Once the first answer is wrong all other attached theories are also wrong.

For instance, take the concept of 'space' do you really think that space ends out there somewhere? Do you hit a wall? What is on the other side of the wall? SPACE????

Now, take a singularity. How can you create a Universe from craming all of space inside of it, and where does this singularity exist? In non-space? Obviously, some one from off planet a more advanced civilization would probably laugh at our science we are so far off the mark it is ridiculus. IF SPACE IS EMPTYNESS, NON-SPACE would ALSO BE EMPTYNESS!!!! Now, let's take this a step further regarding reocurring BIG BANGS. Oh I love this one, the supposition that all of the mass in the Universe will somehow [gravitation is an outside force] collapse into a singularity. RIGHT. That again would require an outside force, which again points to circular logic that an infinity exists with in an infinity. It is an impossibility that another infinity besides this one even exists with in the SAME SPACE!!!!

We live in a continuous creation Universe that is constantly exchanging energy at extreme speeds between large to small scales between matter and antimatter. Fermi Labs has measured the rate of this exchange during collider experiments in flipping rates at three trillion times per second between matter and antimatter in mesons. The HERA collider experiments have already blown away our naive model of the proton by showing unlimited quarks and antiquarks flying out during collisions attached with broken gluon strings. So, what we find in sub nuclear scales is consistant pairings between matter and antimatter, do you think that on large scales this would be any different than what we have found with in nuclear scales???? I doubt it!!!!

Einstein curvature of space time around mass destroyed our ability to see how large scale interactions take place, and made space a substance unto itself and destroyed the model of the graviton. The SR speed limit mythology has crippled our ability to see that gravitons must travel at instantaneous speeds for rotation rates of galaxies to be maintained equally over thousands of light years. You cannot use the speed of light to predict celestial orbits because there is a time delay and that is simply not the case orbits are precise across vast distances. So we are stuck having two theories Newtonian for instantaneous gravity and Einstein for light, but none the less we protect our dogma as if it is a religion that cannot be tampered with. Tesla was disgusted with Einstein's theories of relativity, he knew that electrostatic forces [FTL gravitons also carry a negative charge] propogate faster than light and that all ATOMIC ENERGY originates from a cosmic source. But here again, all we have managed to accomplish by being stuck with Einstein is to suppress inventive genius. The current suppression is about to end. John

cosmicsurfer,

Well what about this! in an infinite eternal universe the "whole night sky" would have to be ablaze with light from the infinite number of stars, galaxies, energy etc. Each and every part of the night sky would/ must be alight with blazing objects somewhere, as all fields of vision would contain an infinite number of light giving objects in any field of vision.

In this scenario countless even an infinite number of light sources all fields of visions must be filled of with light

In an infinite static steady state universe there would simply be no black night sky
With exection of the moon of course

But in reality the night sky is more dark than light
Alan


I feel as if I am a small boy holding but a teaspoon of knowledge standing before the Infinity Ocean of all knowledge

Hi Alan, we only see with in the light spectrum---but most of the energy in the universe operates above our field of vision. The 96% of the missing mass is not dark matter or dark energy but the graviton energy cycle. Matter would look like holes, now here is a scenario 4th dimensional motion approximately 20 billion x speed of light is constantly collapsing into holes---mass.

Gravitons are formed in the center of black holes on the other side of our dual time sphere, where a counter rotating large antiverse would generate galaxies that would eject newly born matter in the form of FTL GRAVITONS which is the beginning of forward time that stream towards our large scale rotation. Here is another point, experiments of counter rotating light fields create a band gap that cancels the light between each rotating field. We will never be able to see gravitons, or the light from our sister miniverse. I find it amusing that we are looking for gravity waves, we will see electromagnetic waves but not gravitons not a chance. Clue, magnetic fields are captured gravitons---electrons fall from right thumb rule into current flow as tired gravitons. John

cosmicsurfer,

John

Gravitons are hypothetic fundamental particles, the so called Higgs god particle. The gravity wave detectors have not up to this point in time ever picked up even the lightest of gravity waves, indeed these waves might not exist. Einsteins Unified Theory field says gravity is not really a force but a distortion in the fabric of space by mass. This was proved in the Arthur Ellington famous solar eclipse of 1914? (I think), where the images stars that should have been at the back of the sun and invisible at that moment were instead clearly visible in front of it, due to mass of the sun bending light around it.

Be a little patient with me guys I have just entered the fray, but you will see in time that am well informed

Alan


I feel as if I am a small boy holding but a teaspoon of knowledge standing before the Infinity Ocean of all knowledge

Hi Alan, I am in disagreement with the standard model although the Higgs field may exist as a BEC type gravitomagnetic effect, the HIGGS BOSON is just an intermediate particle that may or may not exist since we have not seen one yet. However, gravitons are different they have to exist otherwise there would not be a cause for mass formations to take place. You have to complete a circuit to turn on the lights, our universe is powered by a graviton circuit that operates similar to an electrical circuit. Same negative charge only at extremely high frequencies above that of light, high frequencies would tend to push apart and head towards lower frequency domains such that our visible light spectrum again would be like a hole to such high power output. Fortunately, the rectification of this circuit within a gravitomagnetic or static field shields our relativity and allows for unlimited atomic latice formations and life. We do not feel this extreme motion that is going on all around us [and within us], we only feel G force if we push against the lines of force.

All atomic power including nuclear explosions are tied to this immense energy field that is the source for mass formation which is the graviton circuit. Solar Coronal discharges, atomic hydrogen dissociation in vacuums from bound states, cathode anode electrical discharges, and magnetic fields all can be tapped releasing 1000% gain in energy from the graviton cycle. Now, the key is first understanding that you can do this then learning how. We are on the verge of an energy revolution, what is amazing is that it will shake the very foundations of physics and cause all science to re-evaluate our existing theories.

Once you begin to connect the dots it becomes clear that most of what we know is certainly not well understood. We are dealing with a large perpetual motion machine and unless there is a collision with some outside source that puts a wrench in the works which would no doubt be catastrophic because even though matter cannot exist without antimatter---if the two collide you have immediate annihilation. Fortunately, the Universe is infinite [a lot of space even between subparticles] so there is a lot of room for many worlds to form as a result of the two time domains constantly interacting. John