Antigravity Research

Hi Stoat, The "Inverse Fourth Power" scaling factor in BEC gravitostatic field with frozen lines of force certainly exhibits a Bubble effect. A double bubble barrier may exist, just as reverse motions appear in boundary zones around galaxies, a bubble band of reverse motion may be the Antigraviton region that reveals high densities of antimatter and operates slightly out of phase attached to core antimatter induction---Feynman "Advanced Waves" move at FTL speeds dampening effects of gravity. I believe that matter assymetries over antimatter in Forward Time, dampens the gravitational frozen lines of force from an equalizing REVERSE REPULSION FORCE otherwise without antigravitons balancing this inward push we would be crushed into a quasi singularity.

Puthoff ZPE effects exhibit Casimir pressures that are really static field discharges interacting with this extreme lines of force from incoming gravitons. Frozen lines of force from this streaming sets up Bubble resonances everywhere.

I do not think singularities can exist inside black holes or anywhere. John

HOW QUASARS DISPERSE FORMING GALACTIC CLUSTERS

The AGN of a parent galaxy provides a wall of protection from overloading gravitons causing Quasars to maintain spin without flying apart until reaching a certain distance from Galaxy. The mechanism for Quasar dispersal of mass creating potential Galactic Clusters must come from the overloading of Gravitons circulating around wall of a reverse motion Antimatter Core. Through increased heating from increased graviton capture this young highly redshifted Quasar reaches a point of no return when the core of contained Antimatter within the magnetic field also overheats. The jets cannot bleed off core induction of Antimatter fast enough, and the normally cold matter which is radiating Antigravitons in all directions that is enveloped by a magnetic Graviton field form Antigraviton sub eddies and break up into smaller conjoined groupings---forming clusters of Graviton/Antimatter core containment. Remember, it is the Antimatter that is required for seeding genesis of mass formations. So, this fragile relationship must be bound by enough repulsion between the Graviton and Antigraviton magnetic fields that the dispersion takes place evenly without causing a huge explosion! What a balancing act between attraction and repulsion, this is a highly evolved relationship that operates with in non-visual parameters and visual parameters. Because of the FTL nature of this process we really can only see light speed motion, so it is the boundary zones between incoming and outgoing that is also protected in such a way that Gravitons and Antigravitons do not collide with each other! Annihilations are confined around the visual portion only, while La Sage capillary type tubes of force must operate like spokes in a wheel above light speed visual motion. This is a very complex interexchange.

The magnetic gravity fields that circulate FTL operate to protect the radiating cores almost like a liquid surrounds soap bubbles that divide up on the surface of water. The radiational reverse motions of Antigravitons push the regions apart and form an integral balanced relationship between each other and parent Galactic formations. Embilical cords attach through the foam of this process siphoning Antimatter between cores. We are looking at a Universe that is balanced in motion that has self replicating abilities in a continuous creation of mass regenerative processes in Forward Time! John

UNIVERSE EQUALS 100% ENERGY

We have failed to understand that Universe bulk energy dynamics are balanced between 50% forward and 50% reverse time. We think that a system runs down to ZERO to an eventual heat death. That type of thinking originated from a BIG BANG entropic model of Universe operating only in forward time. The failure is even magnified to a huge mistaken perspective that some how all space, all mass, all energy can be cramed into a singularity. Total NON-SENSE, singularities do not---cannot exist period. There is no T=0 it is impossible. A system may run down and ISO ENTROPICISM exists in forward time as a life cycle of mass, but this picture is distorted because we do not see the big picture of how this mass cycles through a greater organized distribution of energy!

Antimatter and Matter Annihilations always regenerate new ANTIMATTER and MATTER ENERGY! Where is ZERO in this equation???? What a joke, that we entertain that we can destroy this cycle and take it to ZERO and especially discount the fact that a timeline can somehow stop, become non-existant, what a huge failure in our science to not realize that there is always a continuum period. Cause and effect relationships are continuous and do not stop. We have failed in our own intellect to understand the greater motion in this continuous cycleing of energy in our Universe---between 50% forward and 50% reverse time graviton/antigraviton cycle that never cancels out to ZERO period!!!! John

Hi John, thinking about your last few posts. The obvious point I like, is Arps idea of lower mass electrons. Remember that I think, that if a anti graviton were slowed to the speed of light it would look like an electron.

Say that a super massive body in the centre of a galaxy has to shed angular momentum. Now its core is a bec and this thing has half of its mass hidden behind a neg r.i. cloaking but it has nearly all of it mass energy hidden but for one h of its mass energy.

It dumps angular momentum from its poles but this is gravitational momentum, we cannot see it. It kicks out two chunks of gravitational space. How big are they? Ill get to that a little later. Though theres not enough to hold together, it will redistribute into the vacuum lattice, of which its mostly composed.

In this space we can have electrons of lower mass, which arent really electrons but gravitons, they carry vast amounts of mass energy.

So, lets take a look at how much mass energy is hidden in an electron. Compare
e = mc^2 with e = mb^2 (b being the speed of gravity) we find that they differ by the value h. One electron holds enough hidden mass energy to create about 794 solar mass suns! There are about 1E 11 suns in a galaxy but we ned two galaxies here, so we get a grand total of a mere 2.51790869E 08 electrons, giving up their total gravitational energy to create our two new galaxies. That is a miniscule amount of angular momentum imbalance that our super massive body has had to correct by dumping angular momentum. 2.29366114862E-14 kg that's basically nothing!!

Taking a quick look at mainstream ideas on this. Its thought that quasar events occur in young galaxies, and only in galaxies which have a pronounced bulge. Once the occur, then star formation stops. They are also thought to be less likely in galaxy clusters.

This would mean that super massive black holes dont form in galaxy clusters, or that they are somehow calmed by being in a group.

If my last post means anything, then an angular momentum imbalance would give us some sort of super greenfly queen sitting in the centre of a galaxy. It can give birth without breaking into a sweat, so why arent we up to our armpits in baby greenfly galaxies?

I think that there can be periods of rapid growth of galaxy clusters. Theyre close together and form a colloid. The population reaches equilibrium.

Does Arp have anything to say about this John?

Hi Stoat, I think you are correct about electrons light speed gravitons. It fits perfectly with a 90 degree FTL portion of a magnetic field in graviton capture exchanging momentum---electron current simply could be the "fall out of virtual electrons" from the looping of FTL gravitons that loose momentum and fall into the light speed current! Both carry a Negative charge, so the magnetic mass is looped gravitons. The question becomes, low mass electrons might still be "spinning gravitons" at extreme rates and until this freshly made electron slows down its spin then it cannot carry as large a looped force of magnetic current gravitons. In this case of redshifted young Quasars, they have a new elecric field so literally this birth process also includes freshly made electrons that are newly droped out gravitons. However, the core motion is faster because of less resistance from having to carry around a large mass so this also equates to a faster smaller electron mass. If Photon emmissions are formed from 1/2 electron continuous collapse of advanced and retarded wave motions then this charge cycle may be limited to low energy highly redshifted light because of the cycling being tuned more to a higher frequency graviton wavelengths so that we cannot see the true release of energies coming from young Quasars. I would expect huge amounts of electromagnetic energies being broadcasted from these cyclones---but, because of the over imbalance of gravitonic energy we will not see this FTL portion of the spectrum.

Regarding your mainstream concensus that states these are young galaxies that bulge producing quasars. That most likely is distorted from an a priori reasoning that these highly redshifted Quasars are from initial period right after the Big Bang. If you could please provide some links to a mainstream commentary regarding Quasar ejections that would be helpful---because I could not find anything that showed a relationship to bulging "young" galaxies. The highly redshifted Quasars in the mainstream documents that I read were not associated with the obvious low redshifted galaxy even though a tail could be seen and there were two Quasars directly above and below the central core. The Quasars were assumed to be gravitationally lensed light from an unseen young galaxy---because redshifted light is proof of expansion according to Big Bang theory thus the Quasars cannot be associated visually and must be very far away. Very convoluted reasoning.

What does make sense is that released Quasar antimatter cores would stop the star formation in a galaxy at least until antimatter induction regrew the core levels to start the magnetic dynamo back up to appropriate strength to restart star formation. Also, clusters might do as you stated have a reduced level of star formation activity---reduced size of cores caused antimatter induction to become too weak to generate strong enough graviton capture. However, this may not be the total picture. I would like to talk with Halton Arp, because maybe some of the ejections are balanced enough to not disperse into clusters and form stable galaxies with enough core development to initiate hot creational zone star formation processes---as shown in a previous Arp post graphic denoting galactic allignments and Quasar ejections. What becomes apparent is that cycling Gravitons really need to be anchored to the electromagnetic dynamo process creating strong enough magnetic fields for initiating nucleogenesis to generate mass. Antimatter depleted cores of Galaxies that have stopped star formation because of newly ejected Quasars reveals that mass creational processes are really linked to a balance between incoming and outgoing gravitons and antigravitons. John