The God-Did-It Theory (was ... 10th Planet)

It's GDI actually... You'll see.

Gregg, apparently you assume that everything written is equally true and valid. You really should cancel that subscription to the National Inquirer. They fudge the facts a bit. Kinda like some science textbooks I've seen...

Most of the books that were tossed were excluded because they were not historically accurate, and they were not written by first century contemporaries of Jesus. The purpose was to separate truth from heresy.

Dangus, when you stand before God, feel free to tell him what you think about His judgment. He was punishing Egypt for enslaving His people for 400 years or so. Some times God uses extreme measures to get our attention. When babies die they go on to be with the Lord anyway. This life is not the important one...

Romans 1:25 "They exchanged the truth of God for a lie..."

OK, everyone got it out of their systems now?

Back to theory ???

NOTE - I don't know for sure that it is possible for science-types and religion-types to talk to each other, but I like to think they can.

Keep in mind that THIS board is intended to discuss theory and evidence (pro and con), not faith. There are other places where faith is appropriate and theory/evidence is not.

I'm not saying that either one is superior to the other. I AM saying that they are different.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>I'm trying to get the unworthy one to stick to science, or at least science-like, topics. I'd like to find out if he or any of his coaches can come even a little close to a reasonable argument in favor of the GDIT.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Consider me properly chastised! Sorry. Can't help myself sometimes....

It's kinda hard to be scientific in a threat entitled "God did it theory" lol

---

"Regret can only change the future" -Me

"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." Frank Herbert, Dune 1965

That's OK, Dangus.

Believe it or not, *I* lost my cool once (maybe twice . It happens to the best of us. We make our apologies and move on.

LB

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />OK, everyone got it out of their systems now?

Back to theory ???

NOTE - I don't know for sure that it is possible for science-types and religion-types to talk to each other, but I like to think they can.

Keep in mind that THIS board is intended to discuss theory and evidence (pro and con), not faith. There are other places where faith is appropriate and theory/evidence is not.

I'm not saying that either one is superior to the other. I AM saying that they are different.


<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Larry,

It just occured to me why Tom and I are having so much disgreement re the Face on Mars -- God Did It! So its natural AND artificial! []

JR

Yeah, maybe we should go with that theory. I mean, if they actually do produce better pictures of Cydonia, and they turn out to show clear signs of intelligent design(heh heh heh), then we probably should pitch the idea that God made it. Otherwise this administration will probably force NASA to throw away the pictures!

---

"Regret can only change the future" -Me

"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." Frank Herbert, Dune 1965