Broken Circle

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Messiah</i>
<br />
The sphere has a finite volume. The Universe is not finite.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I think that is where you are wrong messiah. The universe is finite. Or at least i think so. I think the universe is so large.

north,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>don't forget that and i QUOTE "nothing means nothing" and that "nothing has NO dimension" and this is from you.i can only conclude that you are now dening your own cnclusions.

unless your nothing is not a true nothing!!</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

ANS: I don't follow our statement at all. My "Nothingness" is completely nothing. That has not changed. I have attempted to define that a bit more by saying it is represented by the absence of time and space. That automatically eliminates energy and matter as well.

Where do you see anyting stated differently?

"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

north,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>i don't agree that dimensionality (substance) is not infinite,on the contrary it is!!</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

ANS: There you go again. Making the same old mistake. Making absolute statements for which you can't possibly prove or have physical evidence.

It is an assumption at best. In my opinion (We, like some other attributes) all have one, is false.[]

"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Mac</i>
<br />north,

<b>i don't agree that dimensionality (substance) is not infinite,on the contrary it is!!</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

ANS: There you go again. Making the same old mistake. Making absolute statements for which you can't possibly prove or have physical evidence.

It is an assumption at best. In my opinion (We, like some other attributes) all have one, is false.[]
______________________________________________________________________

mac

its simple really,since nothing is nothing,you came to this on your own by the way,as well you also said that nothing has no dimension,therefore the only thing that has dimension,is well,something!!to say that "something came from nothing" is a blatant contridiction.and therefore INVALID statement.

north,

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><b>its simple really,since nothing is nothing,you came to this on your own by the way,as well you also said that nothing has no dimension,therefore the only thing that has dimension,is well,something!!to say that "something came from nothing" is a blatant contridiction.and therefore INVALID statement.</b><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

A bit confusing here. This conclusion seems to be opposite our general agreement of the same process being discussed under topic "Creation Ex nihilo". Unless I am misunderstanding one or the other of your posts.

Care to clarify before I respond?

"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" -- Albert Einstien

mac

which general agreement is this?? i need you to clarify.