Pioneer spacecraft anomolies

Jim said:
"what other explaination is there for the acceleration other than the offical opinion that heat is the cause?"

There are many possible explanations out there but there is not a single "official opinion". The heat explaination is not an official one. None is.

My explanation is this is a universal relativity effect, one that says contrary to what Einstein presumed, even in the same inertia frame free of any gravity or acceleration, clocks at different location may still tick at different pace instead of being synchronized, for any given observer. This is a direct result from my GUITAR theory, Generalize Universal Information Theory And Relativity, which is based on the simple observation that the the total quantum information of the observable universe is a finite and fixed (constant) quantity.

This quantum information conservation principle is backed up by all experimental evidences so far. It naturally leads to quantum mechanics and explains why hbar is the quantity we see it, and not more or less, as well as explains the existence and magnitude of gravitational force. It solves the cosmological constant problem and explains away that 120 orders of magnitude discrepancy between theoretical physicists' calculation of vacuum energy density and the correct magnitude of cosmological constant. It explains the Hubble Redshift, without the need of the BigBang postulation. It makes many amazingly accurate predictions and calculations, all of which agrees with experimental values completely within the error bar, including the baryon density, CMB temperature, Solar constant, relative abundance of radiactive elements on the earth and in the universe.

The most amazing result would be the precise calculation of the ratio of neutron mass to electron mass, using a very simple model which does not have any adjustable parameter or any correction term. We know the ratio of neutron mass to electron mass has been determined to an amazing precision, the error is no more than 1 part in 10^10. My result gives the correct value for all 10 digits!!!

Based on my calculation, the universal relativity effect will cause an "acceleration" which is equal to:
(4/PI) * C^2/(Radius of the universe)

Which agrees with the observed value.

I will discuss the calculation of neutron mass in separate messages.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Thomas</i>
<br />I have addressed this already in a different thread on this forum: in my opinion the data analysis by Anderson et al.( which seems to show an acceleration independent of distance) is based on incorrect assumptions regarding the travel time of the communication signal.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Yes, you are correct. If the radio signal get out there and back a little faster than they expect, the spacecraft will seem to be closer to us than they really are.

David said:
"Yes, you are correct. If the radio signal get out there and back a little faster than they expect, the spacecraft will seem to be closer to us than they really are."

I do not think they would made such an obvious mistake, in seeing how thorough and detail their analysis is in trying to find an explanation for the anormalcy. Beside if what you say is true, it would be a correction proportional to distance. No correlation to distance is found.

The Pioneer anormalcy has to be explained by new physics and can be explained by new physics. I believe it because my GUITAR theory mandates an effect like that and gives the correct numerical result. The development of GUITAR was never meant to try to explain Pioneer, actually I was a firm disbeliever of the Pioneer amormalcy until I find my theory happen to give the correct prediction, then I have to read again their paper. GUITAR itself is a theory mandated by the principle of quantum information conservation, which is so natural and backed up by all experimental facts so far.

Any one who learned quantum mechanics knows if you have a pure state to start with you end up with another pure state, and if you have a mixed state to start with you end up with mixed state. There already reflected the idea of quantum information conservation, or in another word, quantum entropy conservation.

Quantoken

Quantoken

is it true that neutrons and protons are constantly switching identies. meaning that neutrons become protons and protons become neutrons within the atom.

on a site i'm on this apparently happens!!