Comet Wild-2: first sign of repelling Black Hole

More
20 years 10 months ago #8511 by rousejohnny
Replied by rousejohnny on topic Reply from Johnny Rouse
I regret the ranting on about BB, I squirreled to far from the subject amoung ever growing frustration about the theory. But, I do have a question. Where do the Black Holes get the material to produce the food for an open stellar cluster to feed? What is it using to produce the Hydrogen gas? Is there an aether such as the elysium in MM that is being ripped apart and then reorganized?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 10 months ago #8272 by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from

<i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />Such vorticies should indeed exist, as to the cause of such "black holes" that is debatable.
_____________________________________________________________________

rousejohnny

why "SHOULD" these vortices exist?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 10 months ago #8217 by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from

<i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />IMHO : In my humble opinion.
More complex if they have a real "rigid particle filled" nucleus.
______________________________________________________________________

Leo Vuyk

the problem that i see is this,blackholes are a two dimensional dynamical analysis of a three dimensional dynamic.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 10 months ago #8444 by Jeremy
Replied by Jeremy on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
I do not support completely trashing the Big Bang...well not yet anyway. But what happened to the idea of trying to prove a theory wrong in order to expose its weaknesses or enforce its strengths.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Nothing happened but the problem is that evidence does exist against the Big Bang theory and it is continually denied. FTL doppler shifts have been detected but the interpretation is always in favor of conventional theory. No dark matter has ever been found but it is assumed to exist. How can a theory be disproven when none of its adherents are willing to listen to reason and they add yet another variable to their equations to fudge their way around it? Read about the history of epicycles to see how far people are willing to cling to unsustainable ideas.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 10 months ago #8273 by rousejohnny
Replied by rousejohnny on topic Reply from Johnny Rouse
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />

<i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />Such vorticies should indeed exist, as to the cause of such "black holes" that is debatable.
_____________________________________________________________________

rousejohnny

why "SHOULD" these vortices exist?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

They should exist because of the currents in spacetime or in MM the elysium. I am not saying that the reason for the comet observation is tiny black holes, I am saying that vorticies make up the Universe from quantum to Macro. These vorticies combine positive and negatively charge energy to create gravity =&gt; mass. The major question to answer here would be what strength would be required per unit volume to create a "black hole" in which matter would be broken down and the "hole" would not be filled. In order for the hydrogen to escape without creating even more complexed elements there would have to be an "eye" like that in a hurricane that would allow "leaking". We know from meteorology that eye developement is directly related to strength. How can such a strong "blackhole" exist in unison with such a small object as a comet? So much to learn.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 years 10 months ago #8222 by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
Rousejonny wrote:
Where do the Black Holes get the material to produce the food for an open stellar cluster to feed? What is it using to produce the Hydrogen gas? Is there an aether such as the elysium in MM that is being ripped apart and then reorganized?

I realize this is a complex explanation:
at best see my homepage about the ether and the dual universal relation of each ether particle ading up to zero energy all over the correlated universes.
In short terms however:
If the ether is supposed to be the origin of all energy in all interactions: gravitation electromagnetic etc. due to the vacuum oscillations of the real vacuum particles, and each vacuum particle is able to change shape into other particle forms, then you have a very short answer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.365 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum