- Thank you received: 0
Comet Wild-2: first sign of repelling Black Hole
20 years 10 months ago #8389
by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br />Leo,
Where did the original Giant black hole nucleus come from, what makes up this nucleus and why did it explode? Why did it spin in any particular direction? How can we disprove this, what test should be performed? Are there any perdictions you would like to share?
As for prescription for the smaller blackholes, this could be handled with electrodynamics and dominate volume. However, you would need to define the direction of spin in the black hole nucleus that evaporated.
In the Meta concept of infinate potential you would have to yeild to the fact that this could never be defined because no greater black hole has been observed and the total complexity of the Universe is unknowable. Although you are forced to define the spin of your knowable black hole, the question of why it would stand alone in a singularity would be short sighted and dogmatic. Although I do not think the Universe has infinate complexity, I do have to admit it has infinate potential as Dr. VanFlandern has illustrated as obvious based on basic principles of physics.
How do you handle such questions in your theory?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<br />Leo,
Where did the original Giant black hole nucleus come from, what makes up this nucleus and why did it explode? Why did it spin in any particular direction? How can we disprove this, what test should be performed? Are there any perdictions you would like to share?
As for prescription for the smaller blackholes, this could be handled with electrodynamics and dominate volume. However, you would need to define the direction of spin in the black hole nucleus that evaporated.
In the Meta concept of infinate potential you would have to yeild to the fact that this could never be defined because no greater black hole has been observed and the total complexity of the Universe is unknowable. Although you are forced to define the spin of your knowable black hole, the question of why it would stand alone in a singularity would be short sighted and dogmatic. Although I do not think the Universe has infinate complexity, I do have to admit it has infinate potential as Dr. VanFlandern has illustrated as obvious based on basic principles of physics.
How do you handle such questions in your theory?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 10 months ago #8332
by Leo Vuyk
Replied by Leo Vuyk on topic Reply from
Rousejonny,
The answer is in short terms given by my model features, see below:
the rest you will find: home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40
Some Model Features:
The introduction of a New Big Bang described as, a Semi-Cold Black Hole Nucleus evaporating Big Bang scenario, with CPT (Charge Parity Time) mirror symmetry. As a result we live inside one of the “material” lobes of a CPT symmetric Mirror Universe or Multiverse. However, the structure of this Multiverse, we are able to observe in Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation maps. The new Multiverse seem to have the shape of a 12 lobed Raspberry in Dodecahedron configuration. This is an indication for the existence of 6 material universes CPT symmetric EPR correlated “at a large distance” with 6 anti-material COPY universes.
Photons, Fermions or Oscillating Vacuum particles, are supposed to be real rigid- mutual interchangeable particles by real shape changes. The strong bow tension of the rigid vacuum particles is supposed to be responsible for the dual oscillatory energy needed for all types of vacuum oscillations and all Dark Energy. Vacuum particles are well organized oscillating within a tetrahedral shaped chiral (non linear connected) vacuum lattice, with the form of a 3D spaceframe lattice. Oscillating Vacuum particles are able to transfer photonic information LINEAR along the lattices, at 7/4 of the lightspeed. Gravity is the IMBALANCE between two opposing PUSHING powers: the Oscillating Vacuum (=Dark Energy) against less powerful Graviton Vacuum oscillations radiated by mass. All Fermionic energy / mass has its origin in the vacuum oscillations.
Galaxies are supposed to be LOADED with a variety of tiny-, up to huge NEW Black Holes (=Dark Matter). The big Black Holes are mostly located as stable Binary Black Holes on both sides of disk shaped systems like the Galaxy and Planetary systems. New Black Holes don’t swallow matter, they absorb only the vacuum thus also radiation, this causes positive space curvation, the Hubble redshift and even the collapse of the Universe on itself. The Universe collapses on itself , due to the Vacuum ( Dark Energy) absorption by Black Holes (Dark Matter), and the real matter transformation into Black Holes by supernovas. New Black Holes are MASSLESS and attract and produce matter as far as the so coined “repelling zone” around the BH nucleus. Some Black Holes are supposed to show their exact positions, in the form of lobes of so called Single- and Double lobed Quasars, as Herbig- Haro lobes, or as objects like Sunspots and Comets and even Ball Lightning.
Elementary Particles and Humans, should be able to change within a split moment from observer to observed devices, constantly creating snapshots of reality (“eigenstates”), forced by a constant Holistic (entangled) multi universal mutual guidance, VIOLATING LOCAL CAUSALITY and energized by a constant mechanical vacuum propulsion. However, in the evolutionary process we humans must have developed a system of choice delay called human consciousness, which made us responsible for our actions. Our actions are supposed to be mainly induced by our pre-determined urges and intentions (Benjamin Libet).
The CPT Symmetric Universal hypothesis is in fact an old issue in the physical community, and for some unclear reason left aside. However it is supported by Don.N.Page in: arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9304/9304027.pdf called : No Time Asymmetry from Quantum Mechanics.
Quotation: P.7: “Thus we see that the Gell-Mann-Hartle formulation of quantum mechanics, even with greatly different commuting initial and final conditions (such as ordinary quantum mechanics with its final condition of complete indifference), does not by itself give any time asymmetry for the probabilities. It leads to CPT-symmetric universes if the initial and final conditions are separately CPT invariant. In this formalism, any such asymmetry in the probabilities must lie separately within the initial and/or final density matrix of the closed system. This result is not in conflict with the results of Gell-Mann and Hartle [8], who merely proposed Eq. (22) as a sufficient condition for a CPT-invariant universe”.
The answer is in short terms given by my model features, see below:
the rest you will find: home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40
Some Model Features:
The introduction of a New Big Bang described as, a Semi-Cold Black Hole Nucleus evaporating Big Bang scenario, with CPT (Charge Parity Time) mirror symmetry. As a result we live inside one of the “material” lobes of a CPT symmetric Mirror Universe or Multiverse. However, the structure of this Multiverse, we are able to observe in Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation maps. The new Multiverse seem to have the shape of a 12 lobed Raspberry in Dodecahedron configuration. This is an indication for the existence of 6 material universes CPT symmetric EPR correlated “at a large distance” with 6 anti-material COPY universes.
Photons, Fermions or Oscillating Vacuum particles, are supposed to be real rigid- mutual interchangeable particles by real shape changes. The strong bow tension of the rigid vacuum particles is supposed to be responsible for the dual oscillatory energy needed for all types of vacuum oscillations and all Dark Energy. Vacuum particles are well organized oscillating within a tetrahedral shaped chiral (non linear connected) vacuum lattice, with the form of a 3D spaceframe lattice. Oscillating Vacuum particles are able to transfer photonic information LINEAR along the lattices, at 7/4 of the lightspeed. Gravity is the IMBALANCE between two opposing PUSHING powers: the Oscillating Vacuum (=Dark Energy) against less powerful Graviton Vacuum oscillations radiated by mass. All Fermionic energy / mass has its origin in the vacuum oscillations.
Galaxies are supposed to be LOADED with a variety of tiny-, up to huge NEW Black Holes (=Dark Matter). The big Black Holes are mostly located as stable Binary Black Holes on both sides of disk shaped systems like the Galaxy and Planetary systems. New Black Holes don’t swallow matter, they absorb only the vacuum thus also radiation, this causes positive space curvation, the Hubble redshift and even the collapse of the Universe on itself. The Universe collapses on itself , due to the Vacuum ( Dark Energy) absorption by Black Holes (Dark Matter), and the real matter transformation into Black Holes by supernovas. New Black Holes are MASSLESS and attract and produce matter as far as the so coined “repelling zone” around the BH nucleus. Some Black Holes are supposed to show their exact positions, in the form of lobes of so called Single- and Double lobed Quasars, as Herbig- Haro lobes, or as objects like Sunspots and Comets and even Ball Lightning.
Elementary Particles and Humans, should be able to change within a split moment from observer to observed devices, constantly creating snapshots of reality (“eigenstates”), forced by a constant Holistic (entangled) multi universal mutual guidance, VIOLATING LOCAL CAUSALITY and energized by a constant mechanical vacuum propulsion. However, in the evolutionary process we humans must have developed a system of choice delay called human consciousness, which made us responsible for our actions. Our actions are supposed to be mainly induced by our pre-determined urges and intentions (Benjamin Libet).
The CPT Symmetric Universal hypothesis is in fact an old issue in the physical community, and for some unclear reason left aside. However it is supported by Don.N.Page in: arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9304/9304027.pdf called : No Time Asymmetry from Quantum Mechanics.
Quotation: P.7: “Thus we see that the Gell-Mann-Hartle formulation of quantum mechanics, even with greatly different commuting initial and final conditions (such as ordinary quantum mechanics with its final condition of complete indifference), does not by itself give any time asymmetry for the probabilities. It leads to CPT-symmetric universes if the initial and final conditions are separately CPT invariant. In this formalism, any such asymmetry in the probabilities must lie separately within the initial and/or final density matrix of the closed system. This result is not in conflict with the results of Gell-Mann and Hartle [8], who merely proposed Eq. (22) as a sufficient condition for a CPT-invariant universe”.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.287 seconds