- Thank you received: 0
Questioning Fundamentals
21 years 2 weeks ago #7495
by Jim
Reply from was created by Jim
Now that you have the space figured out how will you go about populating it with matter? I suspect the space between the galaxies has more matter than the galaxies. Some say it is empty. How are the protons distributed in your universe? And is thermodynamics a factor?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 2 weeks ago #6924
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by EBTX</i>
<br />whether matter is pulling itself together or is being pushed together by space (or some other factor).<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
See the book "Pushing Gravity" for a mechanism of gravity that answers both of your questions and many others. -|Tom|-
<br />whether matter is pulling itself together or is being pushed together by space (or some other factor).<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
See the book "Pushing Gravity" for a mechanism of gravity that answers both of your questions and many others. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 2 weeks ago #7496
by EBTX
Replied by EBTX on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">How are the protons distributed in your universe? And is thermodynamics a factor?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I think that space is basically unpopulated by protons compared to galaxies ... because none has yet been detected in such quantities.
And ... I wouldn't think thermodynamics would have any cosmological significance (if you mean the "flow of heat"). As for photons, they are a result rather than a cause with respect to the overall dynamics of the universe, i.e. they don't push stars or galaxies around.
I think that space is basically unpopulated by protons compared to galaxies ... because none has yet been detected in such quantities.
And ... I wouldn't think thermodynamics would have any cosmological significance (if you mean the "flow of heat"). As for photons, they are a result rather than a cause with respect to the overall dynamics of the universe, i.e. they don't push stars or galaxies around.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 1 week ago #7154
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
tom
what do you think of "chiral condensate" as populating the space?!! it has been found!!
what do you think of "chiral condensate" as populating the space?!! it has been found!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tvanflandern
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
21 years 1 week ago #7261
by tvanflandern
Replied by tvanflandern on topic Reply from Tom Van Flandern
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />what do you think of "chiral condensate" as populating the space?!! it has been found!!<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Occam's Razor. -|Tom|-
<br />what do you think of "chiral condensate" as populating the space?!! it has been found!!<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Occam's Razor. -|Tom|-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 years 1 week ago #7157
by north
Replied by north on topic Reply from
tom
Occam's Razor,okay,meaning what exactly?(no clue as to what you are talking about).
Occam's Razor,okay,meaning what exactly?(no clue as to what you are talking about).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.312 seconds