New evidence that Micro black holes are everywhere

Leo,

Before you can get us to pay attention to an idea that seems to depend on the physical existence of a black hole, you are going to have to find a way to convince us that a black hole can have physical existence. Re-read my Mar 13 post, and note that I've made a few minor edits to it.

Deep Reality Physics currently views the black hole as having conceptual existence only. But there is a similar concept, known as a dark star or a Mitchell star, believed to be physically possible. Sagitarius A, for example, is probably one or more dark stars.

Something conceptual (such as a black hole) is not a good tool for exploring something physical, like gravity. But it can be a great tool for exploring something conceptual, like infinity.

Regards,
LB

Hi Leo and Larry,

I am in agreement with graviton faster than light motion as noted in the META MODEL and most of the discoveries as outlined in Tom's book, DARK MATTER, MISSING PLANETS, & NEW COMETS. Also, Leo I agree with you that black holes are everywhere what is missing is a true understanding of their function. I will attempt to reveal why gravitons create mass in motion and describe the true nature of the role of black holes in forward time.




<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />Dear Larry,
To begin with, I would start with the preview list inside Toms book: Dark Matter Missing Planets and New Comets.
I hope that the layout will be the same as in my word document.

Introduction page (xxxii and xxxiii) of Toms book, with my short reactions (yes, no or: ?) including short comments between {-}. A ? means that this is outside my field of research, or more research is needed.

Page xxxii.
With the supposition that you will not put down this book without giving it a chance after merely reading the following list, let me now preview some of the most interesting points to be proposed or discussed within these pages:

/Faster-than-light motion in forward time is possible. { Yes, The vacuum is able to MIMIC c=constant for signals related to massive objects like the Earth}

1. YES, Gravitons are in motion around galactic ecliptic at FTL speeds of motion and are the primary cause for mass to exist in FORWARD TIME; Whereas, Antigravitons are the primary cause for mass to exist in REVERSE TIME.

/Gravitation propagates faster than light. {NO, Solar anchor black holes are responsible for extra pull on the pioneer satellites.}

2. YES, Gravity is an instantaneous force as compared to the relative slower motion of light waves. Solar antimatter jets are caused by mini-black holes formed by concentrated circulating gravitons creating reverse motion antimatter induction. Pioneer Anomaly is caused by the Gravitomangetic Field not solar anchor black holes which produce antimatter. The Gravitomagnetic Field which is a back eddy in motion around solar systems, planets, and the entire galactic plane is caused by the Graviton Capture process.


/The physical universe has five, and only five, dimensions. {?}

3. Not true, there are an unlimited number of dimensions in an infinite Universe. Time operates in two directions, therefore Matter dominates forward time, whereas Antimatter dominates reverse time. We can see an example of large scale motion within the microverse matter and antimatter paired motion found in Mesons.

/The universe is infinite in extent in all five dimensions. {NO}

4. YES, Space is flat it is not a dimension, does not curve, is not a substance and is infinite in all directions, singularities cannot exist in an already infinite space.

/There was no Big Bang explosion to start the universe. {NO, We live in a cyclic expanding and contracting raspberry shaped multiverse}

5. I agree with TOM. The Universe has always existed and is not cyclic-only paired rotations form in space between matter and antimatter from small to large scales.

/The universe is not expanding. {?, Perhaps not, at this moment it could be contracting}

6. The expansion contraction concept represents a total break down in understanding how our Universe cycles energy between forward and reverse time.

/The universal microwave radiation is of nearby origin. {Yes, nearby, because we observe other galaxies behind the radiation outside our own raspberry}

7. YES, CMB radiations probably have more to do with the graviton capture processes from back eddy FTL gravitomagnetic field solar system interactions being hit by FTL gravitons as Pioneer Effect from bubble penetration at 90 degee angle from inward flow of gravitons in arms of galaxies.

/There are no "black holes" in the universe. {NO, Black holes are of all sizes and everywhere, even in the form of sunspots, Comets and ball lightning}

8. WRONG. I agree with Leo on this one black holes terminate the graviton cycle.

/Quasars are associated with our own and nearby galaxies.{?}

9. YES. Halton Arp said it best that galaxies give birth. Mature galaxies give birth through the fission process [Tom understood the fission process] through top and bottom Quasar core antimatter ejections. This process can fail and cause GRB's.

/Galaxies are arranged in waves in an immense medium. (?, Galaxies are arranged by galaxy anchor black holes most of them outside the Galaxy}

10. YES. Isotropic visual Universe appears to be expanding because it is an outflow from a large scale forward time paired motion. We have failed to understand where Gravitons come from.

/Gravitational shielding is possible. {NO, gravitons keep always going after scattering with mass, the oscillating Higgs vacuum pressure minus the graviton pressure (from the mass side) is responsible for the Quantum gravity force}

11. YES. Gravitons are the leading edge of forward time and carry a negative charge. They are a left hand particle and as such are repelled from the slower version Electron. Once we understand that Gravitons are part of a large scale cycle we will be able to travel at speeds faster than light by utilizing this free energy source.

/The force of gravity is caused by a universal flux. {Yes}

12. ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.

/The force of gravity has limited range. {NO}

13. YES and NO, A.) The square of the distance fall off of the Gravitomagnetic Field around mass reduces the localized effects of gravity causing field neutralization in space between objects. B.) The Graviton Flux is constant with in our localized large scale paired motion, causing the processes for creation of mass to be constant.

/The classical description of quantum entities is incorrect. {?}

14. YES I AGREE, as TESLA well noted we have failed to realize that all energy comes from outside the atom.

/The Bell Inequality in quantum physics should be violated.{?}

15. YES. Hyperdimensional quantum entanglement occurs.

/There is no "Oort Cloud" of comets.{Yes}

16. YES, TOM is absolutely correct. EPH caused comets, I think that comet orbits last longer than he stated because of the regenerative effects on orbits caused by a pioneer effect/gravitomagnetic field bubble around solar system penetrated by inward flow of gravitons around ecliptic.

/Comets and asteroids are quite similar in nature. {NO, Comets are micro black holes}

17. Comets are caused by EPH most likely frozen oceans. I have heard that comets contained antimatter, the only source for antimatter is either antimatter induction taking place in black holes or from relativity jets ejecting antimatter clouds above and below ecliptic.

/Comets and asteroids are accompanied by satellites. {?}

18. YES

/A former major planet exploded between Mars and Jupiter.{?}

19. TOM is the leading theorist on this subject. I would have to agree that YES his time line is accurate for EPH events that destroyed the fifth planetary system and left Mars as our fourth planet.

(xxxiii)
/This explosion occurred just three million years ago. {?}

20. YES, 3.2 million years ago the inner asteroid ring formed from destruction of former Moon of Fifth planet and left Mars with a reduced atmosphere and blanket of dust covering frozen oceans.

/This explosion was the origin of comets and asteroids. {NO}

21. 90% YES. Some asteroids come from Oart Cloud cliff being knocked loose by incoming orbitals or captured planetary objects.

/This explosion may be connected with the origins of man. {?}

22. YES

/The Great Pyramids in Egypt are perhaps 9000 years old. {?}

23. YES, built in 10,500 B.C. alligned with Orion's belt and perhilion of Al Nitak.

/Artificial structures may exist on the surface of Mars. {?}

24. YES
/Tidal forces on the Sun and giant planets are significant. {Yes}

25. YES

/There may be a sunspot-planet link. {NO}

26. YES, actually LEO you are correct about sunspots being micro black holes. However, the sun solar energy is generated from Gravitons and that is why there is such huge coronal energy densities as compared to core heating. Low level neutrino output shows how we simply do not understand how energy cicrulates in Universe. Eleven year sunpot cycles are hyperdimensional, and occur as a butterfly polarity reversal from graviton capture and relate to overall antimatter core induction taking place in our central black hole that generates tremendous antimatter magnetic fields in an hour glass formation above and below galactic plane and ecliptic inflow of gravitons. This core generated antimatter magnetic field is repulsive.

/Solar eclipses are best viewed away from the center line. {Yes}

27. TOM established YES regarding that fact.

/Mercury was originally a moon of Venus. {?}

28. Tom agreed, I am not sure.

/Our Moon originated from the Pacific basin of the Earth.{?}

29. Pre-Incan temples talk about Earth having two moons. One was destroyed maybe at year zero which was most likely at 10,800 B.C.

/The Moon no longer shows us the same face it used to. {?}

30. Probably True.

/The Martian moons are the survivors of a great many moons. {?}

31. Yes.

/A great rift on Mars is the impact site of a former moon. {?}

32. I have read Tom's paper, it could be since the Tharsis Bulge sure points to large scale impacts.

/Jupiter's Red Spot is a floating impact remnant. (a remnant of a Comet micro black hole}

33. Hyperdimensional node. Binary Universe, 19.5 degree nodes are on all objects from forward and reverse motion large scale entanglement.

/Saturn's rings are only a few million years old. {?}

34.

/Solar system bodies have received black carbon deposits. {?}

35. YES

/The moons of Neptune were violently disrupted.{?}
/Pluto and Charon are escaped moons of Neptune.{?}
/Another undiscovered planet probably exists beyond Pluto.{?}

The contents of this book indicate that the whole field of astronomy will be greatly revised if a few of these hypotheses are correct, leading to a new vision of the universe, its origin and nature, and our role in it.

36. YES, I agree.

Leo Vuyk.
migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/


<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Leo, I agree Black Holes exist. These objects are caused by graviton capture processes that form matter. The flipping of polarity forming a reversal and antimatter induction is the only cause for black holes. In my opinion, anchor black holes do not exist in terms of relativity jets termination points. If anything these relativity jets are terminated in gamma ray production from hitting matter clouds. We are simply seeing annihilations taking place...I have been reading all of your posts and you are right on in seeing micro black hole events taking place in our upper atmosphere in sprites, and upward flows of antigravitons. We are only going to see electromagnetic with in our visible spectrum, whereas much of what we cannot see operates way above the frequencies of light. That's the problem, we will never see gravitons that travel at TVF motion minimum 20 billion x the speed of light. Localized antimatter positron and electron annihilations occur in our upper atmosphere all the time, but this is just a small amount of the actual volume of true power ratios that exist around all mass. ESA showed that the gravitomagnetic field is 100 million trillion times stronger than what GR predicts. John

Hello John and Larry,

If we forget about the question that black hole exist, I would ask, is the logic of my explanation for the TWO Wang Yang eclipse anomalies ( at Lusaka and Mohe) too complex to understand?
The logic was:
If we assume that the moon is able to have a sreening effect on solar radiation ( all sorts of gravity rsdiation), then there is a firm logic reason to take, my proposal serious for two different intense pushing effects coming in specific BUNDLES AND specifci LOCATIONS from the Sun.

I apologize for the fact that I had to draw a bit complex images to make that clear in stead of doing this with math.

Leo..

<b>[Leo] "I apologize for the fact that I had to draw a bit complex images to make that clear instead of doing this with math."</b>

That's OK. In fact it is a step in the right direction. For most people following a math argument is harder than following a logic argument or a prose narrative. When you are trying to get someone that is not familliar with your ideas to take a look at them, math is often counter productive.

===

Einstein warned us that if we do not understand something well enough to explain it to our grandmother, we do not really understand it.

Grandmothers that can follow math of any sort are pretty rare. I suspect that Albert knew this.

LB

<b>[Leo] " ... is my explanation too complex to understand?"</b>

Probably not. But before we will be interested in expending the effort to learn what we need to learn about your ideas to be able to understand them, you will have to convince us that we should make that effort.

And that gets us back to my Mar 13 post.

LB

John,

Same goes for you.

From time to time we see things in your various posts that are interesting because they have obvious parallels with some of the concepts of Deep Reality Physics. The fact that you do not comment on these parallels tells us that you have made no efort to understand DRP.

We tolerate this behavior but for the most part do not respond to it. Until you make the effort to learn enough about DRP to be able to notice these obvious parallels for yourself, and then explicitly comment on them in print, the possibility of lengthy and interesting technical discussions will remain just a possiblilty. We don't rule it out completely, but unless you post something with obvious breakthrough potential it is unlikely.

===

In our opinion our ideas are vastly superior to your ideas. So we will wait patiently (hmmm, or maybe not so patiently) for you to stop telling us what is right with your ideas and start telling us what is wrong with our ideas.

LB