Stellar Splitting and pairing NEW Black holes foun

Ah, a sudden thought. I've got this equation which can be slung into the lorentzian, h = e^2 mu / 2a epsilon
e is the electron charge
mu is the permeability
epsilon is the permitivity
a is the fine structure constant
The 2a term changes the permeability to the reciprocal of the speed of light, and if we do the same for the speed of gravity, we get a very low velocity which I reckon is the drift velocity, the speed of electricity.

Now, it doesn't fit with the Fermi velocity equations, it's a little too fast.

Think about the Fermi velocity for a moment. Outer orbital electrons are detaching and zooming about at a high percentage of the speed of light at absolute zero. Thats pretty wild.

Anyway, I need to stick in another term to my equation, it struck me that the term could well be gravitational acceleration, 9.8

After all we work out the permitivity in a lab on the earth.

I'll stick in a quote that I posted on Leo's thread about how reciprocals are important.

"... One example is a version of Yang-Mills theory called n = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory, which has as much supersymmetry as possible... There is good evidence that this theory has a version of S-duality. It works roughly like this. The theory has in it a number of electrically charged particles. It also has some emergent particles that carry magnetic charges. Now, normally there are no magnetic charges , there are only magnetic poles. Every magnet has two, and we refer to them as north and south. But in special situations there may be emergent magnetic poles that move independently of each other - they are known as monopoles. What happens in the maximally super theory is that there is a symmetry within which electrical charges and magnetic monopoles trade places. When this happens, if you change the value of the electrical charge to 1 divided by the original value, you dont change anything in the physics described by the theory."

(Edited) oops! that doesn't work back to the drawing board.
[][]

With regard to that last post, I was being hugely pedestrian there. To get the formula e^2mu / 2a epsilon I need another term which is pretty big to get it to work with the Fermi velocity.

When I was talking to Joe Keller about Dayton Miller I said that different materials seem to "know" that they are moving.

The Michelson Morley experiment came up with totally unexpected results. We drive along in a car, sans windshield, on a still day and we can work out how fast we are moving from the breeze. Then we put a windshield in and there's air in the car that's moving with the car. But suppose the occupants of our car can somehow still feel the breeze to varying degrees. The windshield has a lot of little holes in it for one occupant, and less holes for another.

This I would say is down to their individual refractive indexes.

That other term I need to get a tally with the Fermi velocity of copper is 1.37363925822E 07 about one twentieth of light. If all the metals could talk to each other, they'd disagree about how fast the car was travelling but it wouldnt be by much.

I must admit that I am in the middle of an interpretation process.

See perhaps the latest details:

My latest logic based interpretation.
The center of the Milky way is supposed to be equipped with several medium sized DUAL black holes (BHs) forming circular visible gas filaments (elliptic trails) and in the barycenter in the middle between dual black holes: open star clusters like Sgt A, the Quintuplet and Arches cluster. Conclusion: there is NO Giant Black hole in the center of our galaxy.

migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/01...iant-black-hole.html

NO GIANT black hole inside the Galaxy center? Can I explain to cycles scientist what this discussion has to do with cycles? YES.
The mainstream ideas about a Giant Milky way- central black hole are lately firmly supported by clear stellar acceleration profiles around the Sagittarius A cluster, see:
www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/milkyway_bh/index.html

However according to new combined Hubble images of the Sgt..A area there is no sign of any gaseous filamentary Vortex or elliptic structure.
Instead we see more than one clear elliptic filaments around the three stellar clusters called: Sagittarius A, Quintuplet and Arches cluster.
This seems to be a tell tale for more than one (at least three) barycentres as the origin of these open star clusters.
My conclusion based on a new interpretation of black hole splitting and paring
The center of the Milky way is supposed to be equipped with several medium sized DUAL black holes (BHs) forming circular visible gas filaments (elliptic trails) and in the barycenter in the middle between dual black holes: open star clusters like Sgt A, the Quintuplet and Arches cluster. Conclusion: there is NO Giant Black hole in the center of our galaxy.
migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/01...iant-black-hole.html

My model is leading to NEW black holes different from the mainstream interpretation by the introduction of a thin black hole horizon shell of fermion repulsion, leading to dual systems of black holes at all scales with gas formation in the bary center ( the middle)
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...-is-not-able-to.html
see also cloud formation and electric charge distribution in Cygnus A
photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/16...0van%20app%20-39.jpg
Both black holes are supposed to be negative charged and the Galaxy (or star, like the earth ) is always positive charged

Leo Vuyk

The NEW black hole.
If we realize that there is no giant but only medium sized dual black holes inside the Milky way, see;
migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/01...iant-black-hole.html
then there is a firm reason to assume that these black holes have different characteristics then the mainstream always thought.
If we assume that there is an oscillating Higgs vacuum lattice, then such NEW proposals are possible to make.

The OLD black hole has:
An event horizon,
Spacetime decrease,
IN-crease of entropy,
INFINITE gravity in the center,
LOTS of MASS,
No Nucleus (a point singularity),

The NEW black hole has:
An event horizon,
Spacetime decrease,
DE-crease of entropy,
FINITE gravity in the center,
NO MASS,
Real Higgs particle filled nucleus,
With dimensions.
Fermion repelling globular horizon
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/0...sing-effect-and.html
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

Leo Vuyk.