Stellar Splitting and pairing NEW Black holes foun

Thanks Jim. I've seen it but have not read it yet.

I've been thinking about the large/small dimension. Since time and distance are related, I guess large and small must be also. To be in that next dimension would be to be able to look forward and back just as we now can look left and right. Being in two places at once is not that hard, I'm typing with both hands; it's only limited by size.

Hi Jim, I agree that the mass is not concentrated at core because of the galactic wind similar to solar wind [expanding gases and graviton interactions create radiation from hot creational zones where greatest mass formation is taking place] forcing outward motion of mass along trailing arms. Core motion in our galaxy is at 4.4 million miles per hour while galactic wind is at approximate speeds of 1 million miles per hour causing mass with in the galactic arms to move away from the center---whereas the gravitons are moving towards the center core. The eyewall follows the general motion of the incoming gravitons and it is only in the core that a field reversal takes place because of antimatter induction. Our antimatter core generates a tremendous release of antigravitons that forms an hour glass above and below the galactic plane, and this core moves in the opposite direction from the motion of the arms and incoming gravitons. We are literally sandwiched between an antimatter magnetic field that moves in the opposite direction above and below galactic plane. That is why these antimatter clouds are moving in the opposing direction to our matter density that we live in. John

Hi Gregg, that song, the bricklayer's song, the sick note, or paddy and the barrel, was recorded by Noel Murphy and also the Dubliners. If you do a google for it, you can hear it on utube. It's very funny, the bricky tries to haul bricks up seven stories using a block and tackle. He ends up half dead.

My speed of gravity doesn't differ much form the speed of light cubed 2.69440024174E 25 metres per second (speed of light cubed) compared to 1.16464217444E 25 metres per second for my proposed speed of gravity.

Still no word back from that guy du Sautoy but the idea of Gauss' faces on a die is very interesting. I think it would mean that we have to look at quantum numbers as the products of primes.

Say we are toddling along at seven times the speed of light, that's 7h with this s.o.l. to s.o.g. ratio. Well that's a prime number. Foot down a little, and go at eight times the speed of light. That's 2*2*2 = 8 but two is not the only cube root of eight. We also have - 1 - sqrt - 3 and -1 + sqrt - 3 This would mean that quantum numbers hide complex numbers within them.

All this speculation about gravity is very interesting, but is gravity not just a distortion of the fabric of space by mass and therefore, not a force in the real sense?

I feel as if I am a small boy holding but a teaspoon of knowledge standing before the Infinity Ocean of all knowledge

Also one of the experiements in CERN will attempt what has not been done in physics science up to now ; CONVERT ENERGY INTO MASS??

Am I correct on this?

Alan

I feel as if I am a small boy holding but a teaspoon of knowledge standing before the Infinity Ocean of all knowledge

Standard model is distorted by limited thinking on how Universe expanded from a singularity. Unfortunately, we have failed to see that CPT violations are artifacts of our inability to step out of the experiment and perceive the greater order of energy exchange that is continuously taking place with in our galaxy. Mass does not create itself but is maintained by a constant input of energy from an outside source. Space does not curve it is not a substance it is flat, there are no stop signs saying this is the end of the universe, and there was never a big bang event because you cannot fold cramb or cause space to become an infinity within an infinity such that it becomes a singularity. Singularities cannot exist in an already infinite universe. John