Keys

The top image in that post is a direct link..

nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planetary/mars/mr9_inca_city.jpg

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">As a matter of fact, even with hard evidence of artificiality, like a mechanical device, for instance, that still wouldn't mean there were faces all over the planet. For that to be "proven" it would take historical records like hieroglyphics or something of that nature.[rd]
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I find this statement interesting because I'm presently reading a book (America B.C. by Barry Fell) that presents evidence in ancient written languages inscribed in stone, well provenienced, along with carbon 14 dating, proving that Europeans and Mediterranean peoples colonized and or traded in the Americas in 500 BC. There is also substantial proof that the seamanship and ships employed were far superior to what Columbus had at his disposal in 1492.

But mainstream archeologists reject the theory nonetheless. Why? Because <b><i>Kuhn's Law </i></b>is alive and well, and will always prevail whenever new theories conflict with the status quo and entrenched self-interest. What about The Truth? That factor is never really the issue.

Neil

May I suggest ..Forbidden Archeology

Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson quickly became a best selling underground classic, with over 200,000 copies sold and translations in more than 13 languages. This massive work spawned waves of resistance and wonder amongst the scientific community, with over 900 pages of well-documented evidence suggesting that modern man did not evolve from ape man, but instead has co-existed with apes for millions of years!

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> May I suggest ..Forbidden Archeology [Trinket]

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Thanks for the suggestion. Re: the subject of anthropology and human evolution; as it pertains to the never-ending theme of, “What’s wrong with science,” I’d have to say that the interesting controversy in that field is the “Multi-Regional” theory of evolution vs. the “Mitochondria-Eve” theory. The evidence and logic favors the first, the mainstream, and the politically correct favor the second.

Here are some keys with context from the URL topic.

Similar ancient dirt covered pyramids on earth have been dicussed by geologist Robert Schoch.



Schoch also examined similar “shelf” plateaus off the coast of Japan.




The claims for possible artificiality for these faces are based on detail, proportion, orientation, and prior proven artificiality of other faces on Mars.









Face context.



Neil

"Faces, Faces Everywhere"

Neil, an article by Elizabeth Svoboda examines how people perceive faces in hopes of improving face-recognition systems is published in the February 13, 2007 edition of the New York Times.





Here is a collection of some of the classic "faces" (above)- the grilled cheese sandwich with the Virgin Mary (2004) is at the top.

Here is a link to the article:
www.nytimes.com/2007/02/13/health/psycho...tml?_r=1&oref=slogin

Although many of these "faces" look like the fuzzy projections you have found on Mars, they have no relationship to a real work of art such as the Cydonia Face.

Zip Monster