My pareidolia knows no bounds.

Maybe we can do a post mortem?

I tried to keep my replies short. And fast.

But so did everyone else.

KABOOM!

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />
What if we banish the member that is pointing to the original 18th century definition? The one that no one else here has ever used? It's all his fault, isn't it?
***

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
That would be extreme, but you still haven't told me what's wrong with Pareidolia (Rev1).

rd

Sorry Larry, but I think you lost me. Just when I was getting the idea.

We are still going too fast.

<b>[rderosa] "This attempt to turn it into a mental disorder, because we refuse to believe Mars is littered with artwork is a diversion."</b>

Possibly. He may actually be sincere. And the nasty thing about that is that we could never <u>prove</u> him wrong without going to Mars.