- Thank you received: 0
My pareidolia knows no bounds.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
10 years 9 months ago #22234
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br />I'm not seeing the monkeys. That's the problem with a lot of this stuff, in many instances it's a personal experience. But we've usually found that if you make a key others will see it, and then after that they can see it without the key.
How about simplifying it to just the monkeys and a key?
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
[/URL]
Rich, I've highlighted the monkey heads in B&W, should been evident now. Yes you are right, my wife walked in and I had this up on my screen where she saw it for the first time....Monkey's she said....three of them! Another friend saw nothing untill I pointed to them....ahh yes he said, I see it now.
There is quite an inigma to this "visual awareness" and not sure what to make of it. The image infurs a structure for sure, it's even in the other viewpoint taken on a different flyby so it IS there.
Still what one person sees and what another does not, you are right in mentioning this but I sense it is not the straight forward answer you might be hoping for.
Malcolm Scott
<br />I'm not seeing the monkeys. That's the problem with a lot of this stuff, in many instances it's a personal experience. But we've usually found that if you make a key others will see it, and then after that they can see it without the key.
How about simplifying it to just the monkeys and a key?
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
[/URL]
Rich, I've highlighted the monkey heads in B&W, should been evident now. Yes you are right, my wife walked in and I had this up on my screen where she saw it for the first time....Monkey's she said....three of them! Another friend saw nothing untill I pointed to them....ahh yes he said, I see it now.
There is quite an inigma to this "visual awareness" and not sure what to make of it. The image infurs a structure for sure, it's even in the other viewpoint taken on a different flyby so it IS there.
Still what one person sees and what another does not, you are right in mentioning this but I sense it is not the straight forward answer you might be hoping for.
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 9 months ago #22456
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />There is quite an inigma to this "visual awareness" and not sure what to make of it. The image infurs a structure for sure, it's even in the other viewpoint taken on a different flyby so it IS there.
Still what one person sees and what another does not, you are right in mentioning this but I sense it is not the straight forward answer you might be hoping for.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And now we've come full circle.
All of the answers to your questions can be found here:
www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=873
rd
<br />There is quite an inigma to this "visual awareness" and not sure what to make of it. The image infurs a structure for sure, it's even in the other viewpoint taken on a different flyby so it IS there.
Still what one person sees and what another does not, you are right in mentioning this but I sense it is not the straight forward answer you might be hoping for.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And now we've come full circle.
All of the answers to your questions can be found here:
www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=873
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 9 months ago #22334
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />There is quite an inigma to this "visual awareness" and not sure what to make of it. The image infurs a structure for sure, it's even in the other viewpoint taken on a different flyby so it IS there.
Still what one person sees and what another does not, you are right in mentioning this but I sense it is not the straight forward answer you might be hoping for.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And now we've come full circle.
All of the answers to your questions can be found here:
www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=873
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
My intent is not to tell others what I think it is, but rather to present the issues, and examples, that I think go to the heart of what I think the questions are. I'm more interested in what others think, than what I think. So, please take this in the spirit it is intended.
rd
[/quote]
Got it!
Malcolm Scott
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />There is quite an inigma to this "visual awareness" and not sure what to make of it. The image infurs a structure for sure, it's even in the other viewpoint taken on a different flyby so it IS there.
Still what one person sees and what another does not, you are right in mentioning this but I sense it is not the straight forward answer you might be hoping for.
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">And now we've come full circle.
All of the answers to your questions can be found here:
www.metaresearch.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=873
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
My intent is not to tell others what I think it is, but rather to present the issues, and examples, that I think go to the heart of what I think the questions are. I'm more interested in what others think, than what I think. So, please take this in the spirit it is intended.
rd
[/quote]
Got it!
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 9 months ago #22235
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />
Got it!
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Good. So now you understand you're wading in pareidolic waters and all that implies. Let the healing begin.
By the way, what did you think of "The Superstitious S" study out of Glasgow? For therein lies the answer to all your questions.
rd
<br />
Got it!
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Good. So now you understand you're wading in pareidolic waters and all that implies. Let the healing begin.
By the way, what did you think of "The Superstitious S" study out of Glasgow? For therein lies the answer to all your questions.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marsevidence01
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
10 years 9 months ago #22514
by Marsevidence01
Replied by Marsevidence01 on topic Reply from Malcolm Scott
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rderosa</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />
Got it!
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Good. So now you understand you're wading in pareidolic waters and all that implies. Let the healing begin.
By the way, what did you think of "The Superstitious S" study out of Glasgow? For therein lies the answer to all your questions.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Hey! Isnt just fantastic....I'm cured! I want to thank you so much for putting me straight, Ya know, if it wasn't for you....man I would be seeing "stuff" everywhere. I'm gonna name it...<i>Riches Rescue</i>...R&R for short....has a certain ring to it don't cha think?
No seriously though, it's been a lot of fun in this thread....best yet.
I want to thank you for helping me see the light...no wait, maybe that's not really light....no just kidding!
Cheers,
Malcolm Scott
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />
Got it!
Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Good. So now you understand you're wading in pareidolic waters and all that implies. Let the healing begin.
By the way, what did you think of "The Superstitious S" study out of Glasgow? For therein lies the answer to all your questions.
rd
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Hey! Isnt just fantastic....I'm cured! I want to thank you so much for putting me straight, Ya know, if it wasn't for you....man I would be seeing "stuff" everywhere. I'm gonna name it...<i>Riches Rescue</i>...R&R for short....has a certain ring to it don't cha think?
No seriously though, it's been a lot of fun in this thread....best yet.
I want to thank you for helping me see the light...no wait, maybe that's not really light....no just kidding!
Cheers,
Malcolm Scott
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
10 years 9 months ago #22236
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Marsevidence01</i>
<br />Ya know, if it wasn't for you....man I would be seeing "stuff" everywhere. Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I see stuff everywhere. I just happened to know what the mechanism is. By no means am I suggesting that you stop seeing stuff.
One time I showed my wife this quote from Jrich:
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">One gets the impression that those who favor the artificiality hypothesis of the land art do so in major part because they are unable to conceive of how their perceptions could be mistaken so often. I think this experiment demonstrates that it is possible to see what one hopes or expects to see, to do so many times, and with increasing proficiency in visual imagery where no artificial patterns actually exist. <b>JR</b>
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
To which she said: "They have a hard time believing it's pareidolia, but they <b>do</b> believe Martians are drawing pictures all over Mars! Which is harder to believe?"
rd
<br />Ya know, if it wasn't for you....man I would be seeing "stuff" everywhere. Malcolm Scott
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I see stuff everywhere. I just happened to know what the mechanism is. By no means am I suggesting that you stop seeing stuff.
One time I showed my wife this quote from Jrich:
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">One gets the impression that those who favor the artificiality hypothesis of the land art do so in major part because they are unable to conceive of how their perceptions could be mistaken so often. I think this experiment demonstrates that it is possible to see what one hopes or expects to see, to do so many times, and with increasing proficiency in visual imagery where no artificial patterns actually exist. <b>JR</b>
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
To which she said: "They have a hard time believing it's pareidolia, but they <b>do</b> believe Martians are drawing pictures all over Mars! Which is harder to believe?"
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.432 seconds