T or E

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by neilderosa</i>
<br />Remember the 3 separate Profile Image strips each confirming the one before it. And the scores of Cydonia face images, (some were even taken at night). It would be extremely dificult, and take hundreds or thousands of co-conspirators to stay on top of such a hoax.................

Also the T or E with 20+ context images have lots of confirmation. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I agree, but remember there's nothing all that convincing to the vast majority of the scientific community that either of those things are artificial. They are pooh poohing most of the images of the Face, saying they prove it's natural. And you can't really get much mileage out of the T, either. Try showing the T to old friends of yours from high school, for instance, and they are likely to look at you cross-eyed and say, "yeah?.....and?......what about it?

But this new stuff you're finding is altogether different, once you see it, that is. Some of them are hard to see at first, like Peter Pan, but when you see it, it's uncanny. Same with the Clown/Taliban and Jesus. Heck, even jrich admitted he saw Jesus. Also note, these are the first "small" features that we know of.



rd

Here are two more:

"Dopey" (or "Sleepy") is off to the right and up a little from "Jesus" (not shown in this cropping)

{Image deleted temporarily} M0300647Dopey.jpg


"Yosemite Sam" is off to the right and down a little from "Clown/Taliban" (not shown in this cropping). Note that Yosemite's face only is showing. The top and back of his head is cutoff. An alternate name might be "Fred Flintstone".

{Image deleted temporarily} M0200343_YosemiteSam.gif


Just for the record.

rd

Are you guys kidding here! I mean, please please PLEASE post some KEYS!!! I can't see ANY of the faces you are supposedly posting. Colorizing the images doesn't do ANYTHING. Sorry for YELLING but this is getting ridiculous. If you want people to comment on the hundreds of new faces with intriguing names you have made up for them (supposedly a description of the type of face), then we have to be able to SEE them!

Keys, please. Keys.

Emanuel

Please don't get nervous Emanuel. We have other fish to fry at the moment. I will make keys but not right now. We are absolutely convinced that at least some of this present find are not pareidolia, and therefore, the onus is on the official caretakers of this public property to prove that their are no shenanegans going on--that these are real images on the surface of Mars. That shouldn't be hard for them to do once the public wakes up to the fact and demands it.

Neil

Ok here we go. First I'm going to borrow one of Trinket's faces from earlier in this post. This is to contrast with what is to follow. There is no sleight intended; I'm just displaying data neccessary to my argument.



Now here are some quickly made keys of faces arleady posted; please excuse the crudity.

Clown




Devil



Grant



Mugsy



Saint



Indian Woman



Something's got to give.

Neil

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by neilderosa</i>
<br />Now here are some quickly made keys of faces arleady posted please excuse the crudity.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

A couple of them are really good. Like Clown and Jesus. Oh yeah, that definitely does the trick. Of the rest, Grant, Mugsy, and the Indian Woman reinforce what I thought you were looking at, so that's good, but on the other hand, they're not as good of an image as Clown and Jesus. But, there's nothing else you can really do about it. They're still pretty good.

The Devil, I still don't see, believe it or not.

rd