<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim</i>
<br /> How would you describe the relationship between energy and molecules? Heat and motion? What about radiation(which is pure energy I think)?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
To begin with, the folllowing is only personal opinion:
There would not be a "pure" energy. If dissected properly, any energy or force will turn out to be particles in motion and the particles will have mass. It may look to us like "pure" energy because we cannot discern the individual particles. The transferrence of force from one type of particle or its medium to another type of particle and its medium will always involve collision. The geometric nature of the energy or force would be dependent on each medium and nature of the particles. Apparently, gravitons do not interact with one another over a spacial scale that is relevant to such a structure as a solar system or anything smaller. In the elysium, apparently the mean free path distance between elyson collisions is very small, so we have the characteristic of waves. There is further evidence that elysium can be both in a liquid state and a vapor state. Thus we have explosions,
which may be simply liquid elysium boiling into vapor elysium. The overwhelming characteristic of protons is perhaps their geometry.
The entire basis of chemistry is geometry, and IMHO, this extends into nuclear structure, which, in turn, comes from the geometry of the proton. I am alone in this opinion.
Gregg Wilson
