Einstein and all of Science is precisely backward.

If you want sensible answers ask sensible questions. Yes, all those things have conventional definitions you don't seem to like. However, I would like to know how "space" which is not a physical thing can be "easily measured". Sounds like you're just giving physical properties to space just like the relativists.

Isnt it odd that Al Einstein reversed all phenomena and attributed them to measurable mass, which you redily believed, when reality is that all these attributes of light, time, spin, precession, movement and so called mass are attributes of space, which you now say, is non-sense and any questions I ask about this reality is not sensible.

Meta

Meta

does rob define non-dimensional space?

Meta

there is no way to discuss anything on "rob's" site.why?

<i>Originally posted by Meta</i>
<br />Isnt it odd that Al Einstein reversed all phenomena and attributed them to measurable mass, which you redily believed, when reality is that all these attributes of light, time, spin, precession, movement and so called mass are attributes of space, which you now say, is non-sense and any questions I ask about this reality is not sensible.

Meta
____________________________________________________________________

Ans: but how do you show this? in a way i agree,for to me at least, space and matter become at the same time(matter needs space,space needs matter) i wish rob's was more open!! i am curious to conclusions reached,they are in their own way interesting,reminds me of the series PSI-FACTORS(Office of Scientific investigation and Research) i get it here(Canada) on the space channel,Fascinating stuff!! and based on actual case studies, most cases make you think!!(sometimes i think you have to weed out the drama aspect)

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Meta</i>
<br />Isnt it odd that Al Einstein reversed all phenomena and attributed them to measurable mass, which you redily believed, when reality is that all these attributes of light, time, spin, precession, movement and so called mass are attributes of space, which you now say, is non-sense and any questions I ask about this reality is not sensible.

Meta

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

So you say, where's the proof? You keep refering to 0dimensional space, I was taught that 0 dimensions is basically nothing while 1 dimension gets you a point. Rather hard to develop a 3-dimensional universe with observed properties from a point of no extent. Your questions ARE not sensible when you use terminology which makes sense only to you. How do you expect anyone to know what in the world you mean by 0dimensional space unless you first explain it?