<i>Originally posted by Meta</i>
<br />Well Halton Arp has some incredibly intelligent things to say and I believe most of it because Ive checked him out but Arp really doesnt understand whirlpools,solar systems, galaxies or other similar structure if he says it drifts outward. Try again. You see, the only way I would ask a question is because I already know the answer. I just need hard data to back it up.
____________________________________________________________________
Meta
as i have explained to johnny whirlpools effect needs a difference in matrix and it's properties and density.but your whirlpools are not 3D.for instance you are using a fluid-dynamic argument.however whirlpools need a difference in matrix density and properties and they need to reach a top if you will of it's matrix.but looking at a Galaxy perspective one plane of view is equal to another,so which whirlpool plane of perspective is correct? in other words invert your perspective,now which whirlpool effect is right? each is equal or prove which perspective is right.this seems to be a general mistake,is that we take our plane of perspective as the absolute, which of course it is not and we build our theories from our perspective rather from all angles, so that we step outside our perspective to get a truer point of view,360 degrees.
