Meta model and use of Logic

And what about something mush simpler but massive:

Three huge lead balls suspended on the same plane in close distances and suddenly dropping one on a vertical axis. If we can model the change in force in the three body problem we may be able to measure small deviations using laser interferometers. What do you think?

I would say it could be for the benefit of humanity for someone to construct a macro experiment. The ball can be recycled anyway.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>If we have two crystals along an axis and excite one, why the other one should be excited? Due to acoustic coupling? Due to mutual induction? And what this excitation will have to do with gravity at all? Gravity is there anyway. How it is affected by the coupling? And if it did, how do we separate the component due to gravity from our measurements?<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>Acoustic and EM coupling can be easily shielded; furthermore, they must be retarded. So we look for an instantaneous component whose phase does not depend on distance.
When you put a "dipole" made of two masses into oscillation wrt the centre of masses, there's a 1/r^3 oscillating component in their resultant field - exactly that component produces a gravitational coupling between the oscillations of xtals. The xtals act as arrays of microscopic gravitational "dipoles".
Hardly any modification to the scheme is needed, as there really is a non-shieldable coupling between big quartz xtals of near-identical resonance freqs. Spatial dependence of coupling further allows us to easily distinguish a gravitational coupling from couplings of any other known kind.
The scheme is cheap and quite workable in a desktop experiment.

I just finished reading the link on the transformation of elements. It is the most interesting research I've read in many years. It should qualify for a Nobel prize if it can be varified elsewhere. I am wondering if silicon foil would react in this way and what it would produce. It seems quite reasonable to me the mantle of Earth uses a process like this to generate energy needed to the power systems on the planet. One reason there is little interest in this is it contradicts currently beloved theory so most people would dismiss it as nonsense.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>I just finished reading the link on the transformation of elements.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>Now you can understand what sort of sources feed my wrath against the "mainstream" conformist "science".
Their results were (actually have been for years) replicated in one more lab in Russia, at the Kazan university.

This is a very different process than what is currently accepted theory about how this work is done in the cores of stars. The proof and duplication of the transformation will over turn 75 years of ideas about nuclear physics and how stars work.

BTW, magnetic monopoles promptly ruin all the accepted theories of electrodynamics.