Missing Galaxy cluster Shadows and Huge CMB Voids

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Leo Vuyk</i>
<br />a cyclic central Big Crunch black hole<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">In Meta Science, there are no black holes (as Einstein also argued). You are cherry-picking data that fits your preconceptions -- the process that gave us the Big Bang in the first place. Its days are clearly numbered.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">It also seems the solution for the so called "MISSING GALAXY SHADOWS".<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">No, you can't use the "missing shadows" and ignore that the quadrupole moment is 99.9% correlated with the ecliptic plane and the solar velocity vector in local space. That forces at least a major component of the microwave radiation to be local.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">The void in the middle<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">If looked at in relation to other pencil-beam surveys, this is simply an "along-wall" view. The proof of that will be if another such "void" appears in the opposite direction.

You are just modifying the Big Bang -- a strategy that will not be accepted by either Big bang proponents or by proponents of alternatives. And you are picking data that fits and ignoring data that doesn't fit. That strategy will go nowhere fast. -|Tom|-

I agree with you that my proposals doesn't fit into the Meta research ideas.
Sorry.

Leo.

In second reaction, I copy here my ideas about the EPR- based symmetric evaporating Black Hole Big Bang and as a result ideas about Free Will.

[remainder of message deleted; contents were primarily advertising for the author's book. We don't allow advertising on this site. -- tvf]

Explaining dark matter and dark energy can be done by a simple observation. The problem exists because gravity is not doing what models say it should do. The belief in dark stuff is a matter of faith in a model and rejection of gravity.