Astrophysics at galaxy center counters Relativity

This 3 km ball can shield between about 1% to over 100% of the mass of the sun. If it's made of degenerate iron, then it can "cloak" 2.53E 30kg, the sun's mass is 1.99E 30kg. So let's say that it's hiding about the same mass as the sun.

Just for amusement I decided that this thing would have an ocean of superconducting electrons[8D] but I don't thing our little planetoid would be oblate, I think it's going to be prolate. If it ever got out of equalibrium it would become a thin lentil shape. Then it would shoot out electrons from its poles

Another thing that struck me, is that this thing that acts as a star delta node between our three quarks, is "positron like" in the neutron, and the core of our sun is going to be neutrons. This may account for all the missing positrons in the universe.

(Edited) Add to this, a neutron star is about 30km across. Dust and gas whips round such a star at 40% the speed of light. I'm arguing that at this neg r.i. 3km region light can travel, and so can aggregate matter, at twice the speed of light. It can do this becuase its in a bec. The superconducting sea of electrons can dip back and forth over the 3km limit and transfer ftl graviton energy. I don't think it's any great leap of imagination to think that this is where protons are made and atoms built up.

(Edited again) A sudden thought [] if photons and electrons can draw on gravitational energy when inside a negative r.i. space, then they are drawing on a vast ammount of energy. This 3km core, in our sun, is going to be masking a little over 4% of the suns real mass at the moment (it's mostly helium). But this core is building heavier atoms all the time. Now it's not building them from the energy of the rest of the sun's electomagnetic mass but from gravititional energy. Once it's made the 3km ball all into degenerate iron, it becomes something that is about a third more massive than the mass of the sun that we can detect. It goes nova. Now it's though that our sun cannot go nova, it' not massive enough. I don't know [] perhaps it can[}][]

A bit more on this 3km ball of neg r.i. at the sun's centre. It's prolate, shaped like an american football, or rugby ball. Let's say that at, or about the boundary it creates heavier atoms, and packs half of them into the neg r.i region. As it builds up to iron, it beomes a thinner and thinner football. A convex lens butit behaves like a concave lens. So let's superimpose that onto a profile of the very thin american football. the concave lens will have two flats at the poles, these are mirrors. When a nova goes off, it explodes from these mirrors, rather like a one shot laser. That box like image of a supernova, is an image of two cones bursting from these mirrors.

If matter is created at or near this 3km ball of neg r.i material, and it's created from gravitational energy, rather than electromagnetic energy, then we can expect that hydrogen is converted to helium just inside the 3km zone. The next element is a little further in and so on up to iron (and beyond?) Let's say that half stays inside the 3km volume and the other half is kicked out into the volume of positive r.i. (This is probably wrong as a ratio but will do for now) This would mean that a sun can create heavier elements in parallel job lots, rather than as a sequential build up over time. Radioactive elements at the barrier would be at low internal frequency and so wouldn't be able to decay. They would only gain their characteristic half life on being ejected from the sun.

(Edited) Thinking a bit more on this. In a young star, the chances of creating an iron atom are low. As the 3km core becomes more prolate with age the ratios of light to heavy atoms starts to com into line with what we would expect, about one iron to fifty helium.

Of course this would mean that very early suns, which are supposed to be heavy element poor, could release more heavy elements on going nova than they are thought to.

A little bit more on this. If the elements are built up inside this 3km ball, tehn all of them are built up and some which are larger than what's in the periodic table. This would suggest that big bang first generation stars did produce heavier elements, and the universe didn't have to wait very long to have a build up of the elements built upto iron in groups of four. Of course that also could mean that there never was such a thing as a pure hydrogen star.

Now, once this superconducting ball at the centre of mass objects is switched on, it's hard to switch off. A dead star continues to radiate its mass away as gravitons. Over billions of years it will disappear like a boiled sweet.

What is of great interest, is the nature of such a set up's Le Sage shadow with a nearby planet. I would argue that the shadow has an umbra and penumbra. The umbra part connects to two spheres of neg r.i material. What would be its properties?