- Thank you received: 0
Requiem for Relativity
15 years 2 months ago #23757
by nemesis
Replied by nemesis on topic Reply from
Maybe this is actually the debris from an exploded planet. According to Dr. Van Fandern's theories, this has happened several times in 5 billion years in our own system. The probability of seeing the aftermath of an explosion should be considerably higher than a mature system collision, if Dr. Van Flandern is correct.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Joe Keller
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 2 months ago #23758
by Joe Keller
Replied by Joe Keller on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by nemesis</i>
<br />Maybe this is actually the debris from an exploded planet. According to Dr. Van Fandern's theories, this has happened several times in 5 billion years in our own system. The probability of seeing the aftermath of an explosion should be considerably higher than a mature system collision, if Dr. Van Flandern is correct.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thanks for this contribution! Maybe every 6340yr, an unknown force causes some asteroids to explode. Depending on which asteroid(s) exploded, and how they exploded, c. 12680 or 12900 yr ago, the fragments might have been too small to make big craters, and there might have been unusually little iridium for the quantity of nanodiamonds.
<br />Maybe this is actually the debris from an exploded planet. According to Dr. Van Fandern's theories, this has happened several times in 5 billion years in our own system. The probability of seeing the aftermath of an explosion should be considerably higher than a mature system collision, if Dr. Van Flandern is correct.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thanks for this contribution! Maybe every 6340yr, an unknown force causes some asteroids to explode. Depending on which asteroid(s) exploded, and how they exploded, c. 12680 or 12900 yr ago, the fragments might have been too small to make big craters, and there might have been unusually little iridium for the quantity of nanodiamonds.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Joe Keller
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 2 months ago #23037
by Joe Keller
Replied by Joe Keller on topic Reply from
Barbarossa Resonates with "Uranus minus Neptune"
The most accepted values for the periods of Uranus and Neptune, are 84.01 and 164.79 yr, resp. If these are accurate to the last digit, then Uranus passes Neptune 36.994 times per 6340.0 yr Barbarossa orbit.
The most accepted values for the periods of Uranus and Neptune, are 84.01 and 164.79 yr, resp. If these are accurate to the last digit, then Uranus passes Neptune 36.994 times per 6340.0 yr Barbarossa orbit.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Joe Keller
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 2 months ago #23038
by Joe Keller
Replied by Joe Keller on topic Reply from
Bishop Ussher Gives the Mayan Long Count?
Barbarossa's incoming latus rectum was 1144AD. The interval after Ussher's creation date, 4004BC, is 5147yr, differing only 0.4% from the Mayan Long Count. Ussher's 4004BC is to Barbarossa's incoming latus rectum, about what the Mayan 3114BC is to Barbarossa's outgoing latus rectum.
Barbarossa's incoming latus rectum was 1144AD. The interval after Ussher's creation date, 4004BC, is 5147yr, differing only 0.4% from the Mayan Long Count. Ussher's 4004BC is to Barbarossa's incoming latus rectum, about what the Mayan 3114BC is to Barbarossa's outgoing latus rectum.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Joe Keller
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 2 months ago #23105
by Joe Keller
Replied by Joe Keller on topic Reply from
Heinrich Events: Barbarossa Laps Precession
Small climate changes called "Heinrich events" reportedly happen at variable intervals, every seven to ten thousand years. (See: Bond & Lotti, Science 267:l605, 1995)
Let's do this math ourselves. From the sky surveys, I found Barbarossa's orbital period, 6340yr. Newcomb found Earth's (rotational) precession period, 25785yr. While Barbarossa makes one orbit, Earth's precession makes about one quarter cycle. Barbarossa must gain another 90 degrees to catch up to, and lap, Earth (if the presumed opposite direction of the motions, Barbarossa's orbit prograde vs. Earth's axis precession retrograde, could be made superfluous). Barbarossa might be fast, moving from perihelion to latus rectum in 434yr, while Earth precesses little. So, almost the shortest Heinrich event interval, is 6340+434=6774yr.
Barbarossa might be slow, moving from latus rectum to aphelion in 2736yr. Meanwhile Earth precesses about 1/8 cycle, so Barbarossa must move an extra 1/8 cycle, but then Earth has time to precess another 1/16 cycle, etc.; 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ... = 1/2, so this Heinrich interval, about the longest possible, is 6340 + 2736*2 = 11812.
Small climate changes called "Heinrich events" reportedly happen at variable intervals, every seven to ten thousand years. (See: Bond & Lotti, Science 267:l605, 1995)
Let's do this math ourselves. From the sky surveys, I found Barbarossa's orbital period, 6340yr. Newcomb found Earth's (rotational) precession period, 25785yr. While Barbarossa makes one orbit, Earth's precession makes about one quarter cycle. Barbarossa must gain another 90 degrees to catch up to, and lap, Earth (if the presumed opposite direction of the motions, Barbarossa's orbit prograde vs. Earth's axis precession retrograde, could be made superfluous). Barbarossa might be fast, moving from perihelion to latus rectum in 434yr, while Earth precesses little. So, almost the shortest Heinrich event interval, is 6340+434=6774yr.
Barbarossa might be slow, moving from latus rectum to aphelion in 2736yr. Meanwhile Earth precesses about 1/8 cycle, so Barbarossa must move an extra 1/8 cycle, but then Earth has time to precess another 1/16 cycle, etc.; 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ... = 1/2, so this Heinrich interval, about the longest possible, is 6340 + 2736*2 = 11812.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Joe Keller
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 2 months ago #23759
by Joe Keller
Replied by Joe Keller on topic Reply from
The time interval between, the sighting of Sirius on the meridian at the vertex of Menkaure's pyramid with Arcturus at the vertex of Khufu's, and the sighting of Sirius on the meridian at the vertex of Menkaure's with Barbarossa's 20l2 position in the constellation Crater at the vertex of Khafre's, is 6170yr. This differs only 2.7% from Barbarossa's orbital period, and the location differs only 0.8deg from Barbarossa's Dec. 2012 position.
It would seem that the Egyptians used their freedom, in the design of the Giza pyramids, to memorialize information about the orbital period and critical sidereal location of Barbarossa. The numerical agreement is all the more remarkable because of the hints that Earth's rotation has been disturbed in the meanwhile.
It would seem that the Egyptians used their freedom, in the design of the Giza pyramids, to memorialize information about the orbital period and critical sidereal location of Barbarossa. The numerical agreement is all the more remarkable because of the hints that Earth's rotation has been disturbed in the meanwhile.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.429 seconds