Requiem for Relativity

This should interest you Joe. Have you talked to these guys? www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-...et-solar-system.html

On the same subject of proposed planet x www.astroengine.com/2009/04/where-is-planet-x-where-is-nemesis/

I downloaded the Italian paper from the link at the bottom of the page but haven't read it yet.

Sloat, You have posted two more gems and they indicate the object Dr Joe does not in fact exist. So, now is the time to look at what is wrong in the math always used by astronomers. The basic problem(IMO) is the misplacement of gravity force that is a clear result of assuming too much when placing the mass of an object at it's center.

Hi Jim, I put the link up so that Joe could have a read of it. Particularly as there's a mention in the Italian paper of the cmb.

Another little article that has a bearing on the question of planetary formation. www.mpg.de/1172275/protoplanetary_disks?filter_order=L

This one is a different style image of the same star.
images.spaceref.com/news/2011/oofigure1e.jpg

First thoughts on that. The star is off centre from one of the "rings," a collapsing protostar will first eject a disk of material from its equator. This will be about half the star's initial mass. At its next disequilibrium point, it will eject a Jupiter mass, or greater, protoplanet. Both bodies have to move when this happens.