- Thank you received: 0
Meta-Reality
19 years 9 months ago #12356
by EBTX
Reply from was created by EBTX
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">somehow <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
That's your post's most trenchant statement.
Why do people think that using arcane adjectives like a machine gun at the St. Valentine's Day massacre and name-dropping like an allied sortie over the Ruhr is "somehow" an explanation of anything? ... or even the beginning of an explanation?
Wouldn't it be easier to say <i>"We should be able to get causality out of the non-causal ... somehow"</i>. It would still be a bad post but at least you wouldn't seem laughably "puffed" up ;o)
That's your post's most trenchant statement.
Why do people think that using arcane adjectives like a machine gun at the St. Valentine's Day massacre and name-dropping like an allied sortie over the Ruhr is "somehow" an explanation of anything? ... or even the beginning of an explanation?
Wouldn't it be easier to say <i>"We should be able to get causality out of the non-causal ... somehow"</i>. It would still be a bad post but at least you wouldn't seem laughably "puffed" up ;o)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 9 months ago #12507
by Messiah
Replied by Messiah on topic Reply from Jack McNally
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by EBTX</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">somehow <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
That's your post's most trenchant statement.
Why do people think that using arcane adjectives like a machine gun at the St. Valentine's Day massacre and name-dropping like an allied sortie over the Ruhr is "somehow" an explanation of anything? ... or even the beginning of an explanation?
Wouldn't it be easier to say <i>"We should be able to get causality out of the non-causal ... somehow"</i>. It would still be a bad post but at least you wouldn't seem laughably "puffed" up ;o)
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
[]APPLAUSE -
Although I think it is rediculous to think the existence of the Universe was the result of cause and effect. Existence is based on a principle - NOT a process. Principles are fundamental, so is existence. Processes are a function of principles much like cause and effect is a function of existence.
Get back to basics if you want to find the truth.
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">somehow <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
That's your post's most trenchant statement.
Why do people think that using arcane adjectives like a machine gun at the St. Valentine's Day massacre and name-dropping like an allied sortie over the Ruhr is "somehow" an explanation of anything? ... or even the beginning of an explanation?
Wouldn't it be easier to say <i>"We should be able to get causality out of the non-causal ... somehow"</i>. It would still be a bad post but at least you wouldn't seem laughably "puffed" up ;o)
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
[]APPLAUSE -
Although I think it is rediculous to think the existence of the Universe was the result of cause and effect. Existence is based on a principle - NOT a process. Principles are fundamental, so is existence. Processes are a function of principles much like cause and effect is a function of existence.
Get back to basics if you want to find the truth.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.236 seconds