EPR correlated Anti-mirror Universes

If two objects communicated by the amplitude of a wave running parallel between the two objects they could communicate faster than the speed of light. The amplitude would have to be the size of the universe in this case, though.

Ein.stain's Relativity did not forbid FTL. The theory just implies that we will not be able to see it happen.

I have a pdf paper here somewhere that states that FTL is possible if there is communication between two units in a medium which, communicating units of space, is less than one wavelength from the source. It says that if this wavelength gets any longer than one wavelength from the source, the velocity slows to light velocity.

For this to work there has to be a medium and there has to be communicating entities in that medium that are smaller than the maximum one wavelength.

Found it in the Active PDF's:

Superluminal Near-field Dipole Electromagnetic Fields by William D. Walker

www.rgrace.org/indexes/pdf.html

Meta

I believe Leo's version 21 has a duality by seperating two universes.
However, two universes can be overlapped.
However, one of the characteristics a universe must have, in my opinion, is the quality of being one whole fabric, undivided.
Among other phenomena, this one fabric would allow the above FTL communication of information.

Meta

For an overview of my whole model see: home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/

Here I present the latest news: of

The outlines of a Theory of Everything,

with Cosmological Non-Local CPT Symmetry at a Distance.

A Chiral “Oscillating Quantum Vacuum Lattice” and "Big Bang-entanglement"

could lead to the explanation of how the Quantum Mechanical World is able to mimic Relativity.

By: Leo Vuyk, Version 21, ( December 9-2003 )

Einstein as a child, tried to imagine how the world would look like from the position of a photon.

If imagination is the motor of our changing interpretation of the world, then we should work on our imagination, on all scales.

CONTENTS: see the TABLE OF CONTENTS

WARNING.

In the collection of new ideas of this model, it will be hard to cope directly with weird stuff like the following:

The Hot Big Bang Inflation scenario should be replaced by a semi-Cold Black Hole evaporation, with CPT (Charge Parity Time) symmetry. A Photon, an Electron or an Oscillating Vacuum particle, is a real rigid but complex shape changing particle, without an individual independent existence. Gravity is the IMBALANCE between two opposing PUSHING powers: the Oscillating Vacuum (=Dark Energy) against less powerful Graviton Vacuum oscillations radiated by mass. Galaxies are supposed to be LOADED with a variety of invisible tiny, small up to huge Black Holes (=Dark Matter). Black Holes don’t swallow matter, they swallow only the vacuum itself. Black Holes are MASSLESS and attract and produce matter as far as the so coined “repelling zone” around the nucleus. Some Black Holes are supposed to show their exact positions, in the form of lobes of so called Single- and Double lobed Quasars, as Herbig- Haro lobes, or as objects like Sunspots and Comets.

Elementary Particles and Humans, can change within a split moment from observer to observed devices, constantly creating snapshots of reality (“eigenstates”), forced by a constant Holistic (entangled) multi universal mutual guidance, VIOLATING LOCAL CAUSALITY and energized by a constant mechanical vacuum propulsion. However, in the evolutionary process we humans must have developed a system of choice delay called human consciousness, which made us responsible for our actions. Our actions are supposed to be induced by our pre-determined urges and intentions (B.Libet).



NEWS :

The Earth is surrounded and even hit, by matter repelling micro black holes (Comets etc.)



XXXX Stardust Film reveals the Hollow Cap/ Black Hole secret of Comet Wild-2 XXXX

The next Film made by the Stardust spacecraft camera shows evidence for a Hollow Cap structure of the Comet Wild-2. (see: antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040119.html )

The Wild 2 Comet seems to have a HOLLOW ICE STRUCTURE with the shape of a plastic bath cap of grey ice with a big zero-light reflecting hole at the opposite side of the Coma tail, which has been crossed by the Spacecraft itself to pick up material from the tail. These phenomena are in line with the prediction of this model, that Comets, Sunspots and Quasars are hosting small “NEW-PARTLY REPELLING” Black Holes. Inside Comets, these Black Holes are supposed to be small and produce a mixture of complete (anti-) atoms at once, by the strong VACUUM CURVATION around the black hole which is supposed to produce a positron/ electron mixture directly out of the Chiral Vacuum. For this model, it is assumed that the vacuum in our “material” universe has a preferred chiral (left or right handed) oscillation direction, which is the origin of our “material universe” producing much more Hydrogen than Anti-Hydrogen. As a consequence these atoms will annihilate each other which produce x-ray radiation. X-ray radiation is already observed from Comet Hyakutake. See: www.iki.rssi.ru/solar/eng/hyakutak.htm The Hydrogen production is expected to be located outside the “repelling zone” of the Black Hole and inside the Icy hollow structure of the Comet. ( see table of contents page 9 .) The hydrogen particles or even heavier stuff are spewed out of the Comet, mainly into the direction of the Sun, which coincides with the open side of the Comet and is opposite to the Coma tail. See: ESA picture of Comet Halley, www.science-park.info/astronomy/other_body.html

XXXXX The “Small Comets debate” and a possible Ball Lightning/ Mystery Ball relation. XXXXX

It was professor Louis A. Frank and John B. Sigwarth, (University of Iowa) who proposed first in 1986, the relation between so called “Atmospheric Holes” and the possible origin the so called “small Comets” bombarding the Earth in large numbers : up to 10.000 each year. See: smallcomets.physics.uiowa.edu/wp.html . If those small Comets have the same Hollow Ice Cap shape and structure as described above for bigger Comets, including a small internal Hydrogen and even Oxygen producing Black Hole, then we have to search for possible origins of these Tiny Black Holes probably on Earth.

As is described in my Ball Lightning Paper, (Canterbury 1995 . see table of contents page 18-22 ) one of the possible origins for Ball Lightning is supposed to be a Tiny Black Hole produced by incidental “interference” of Electro-Magnetic Lightning waves. It is well known, that on top of severe Thunderstorms, knotty Lightning effects are present up to 50-100 km altitude which are called “Trolls, Gnomes or Pixies” see: space shuttle pictures: geology.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm...nasa.gov/skeets.html It was Paul McCrone, (Creighton University Nebraska 1996) who made a video of an even more interesting phenomenon called a glowing “Mystery Ball”, travelling with 1/100 of the speed of light, at about 80 km altitude, thus without MASS. See the next (slow loading) list under: McCrone “mystery ball”, which also gives other examples of glowing balls falling from the sky: www.tuvpo.com/special/eng/pdf/geo.pdf .

If “Small Comets” are equipped with “small Black Holes” and Small Comets are used to fall from the sky, originating “Atmospheric Holes”, then as a consequence the small Black Hole is supposed to survive on lower altitudes than the “nuclear ice cap” and buried in the Earth or explode before, like ordinary Ball Lightning does. As is described before, all sorts of Black Holes are supposed to have no mass. As a consequence this Mystery Ball should be a firm candidate we are looking for, as the origin of Small Comets. The well known explosion in Siberia in 1908, could have the same origin. See: www.dailypast.com/nature/siberia-meteorite.shtml



New Mass dependent Drag effect, the origin of the isotropy of the Lightspeed. New experiments will falsify Einstein’s famous Lightspeed Postulate.



XXXXX Future Low Elevation Satellite Light Speed Test: XXXXX

According to the famous Michelson and Morley (M&M) lightspeed experiment, the null result could be explained by the Lorentz contraction of the apparatus in the direction of the Motion of the Earth through the light medium Reference Frame. Due to the perfect one-way GPS signal speed measurements we make today at elevations of more than 5 degrees, we know now with certainty, that the one-way lightspeed around the Earth is really constant for GPS elevations above the horizon of more than 5 degrees. However it was Dayton Miller who made the same M&M measurements (1926, within a horizontal plane, less than 5 degrees) on a high mountain summit of Mount Wilson. His results are very clear pointing into a direction of some (anti-Einstein) diurnal Reference Frame effect (lightspeed or contraction effect, see: allais.maurice.free.fr/English/media12-1.htm ) .

As a consequence it should be still an scientific obligation of the highest order, to search for subtle flaws in lightspeed measurements, such as low elevation GPS measurements (with eleva