A New TOE?

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=2 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
I'm just stirring the pot, but it might be worth a look.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

My first reaction was that it seemed to be another 'cold fusion' scheme, but I have to admit this page caught my attention:

[url] www.blacklightpower.com/management.shtml [/url]

I worked for ABB Combustion Engineering as a chemist during the time that Shelby Brewer ran the nuclear division, though I was in the fossil end of it. Navy nuclear guys are not typically nutter types, and there are a bunch of them on the board. For sure, Brewer knows the power generation industry. I'm wondering if its time to buy stock.

Still, this is the first I've heard of hydrogen having a ground state lower than the CRC Manual sets it at.

Yeah, the theory is revolutionary to say the least. The NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NAIC) is actually funding a preliminary propulsion study using it. They're located here:

www.niac.usra.edu/

Lots of other neat stuff on their site, also.

Keep a very tight grip on your wallet.

Gregg Wilson

Actually, I wasn't plugging the product. I was just wondering if there is anything to the theory, and I thought people here might be interested...

Mills has at least been consistent in having outside labs conduct tests and document results to avoid criticisms of bias. He recently lost a battle with the patent office to secure protection for some of this work. Apparently the patent office now acts as a peer review board instead of granting patents. If you discover something that works that conventional theory says can't happen ergo you must be wrong.