- Thank you received: 0
C Squared
20 years 6 months ago #9838
by Don Omni
Replied by Don Omni on topic Reply from
It might be the Tarantino in me GD but it's Genesis 1:4 when God divides the light from the dark is what gravity is like I implied on the speed of gravity page.
We'd get the wave cone E^2/c>\/=h^2/16pi^2qt then just divide a photon. E^2/hc>\/=h/16pi^2qt. We're just assuming that energy per distance E^2/hc becomes force that's classically Gm1m2/d^2>\/=h/16pi^2qt. Yet that's just the quantum uncertainty gravitational force.
Gm1m2/d>\/=hd/16pi^2qt that's Gm1m2/d>\/=hc/16pi^2q is the gravitational uncertainty energy. Gm1m2/cd>\/=h/16pi^2q is gravitational uncertainty momentum.
So classically gravity appears to be force, specially gravity appears to be energy, and generally gravity appears to be momentum. I could go into rigorous explanations but gravity's simply curving light. If I was to say that assuming repulsive charge Kq^2/d^2>\/=h/16pi^2qt then charge would be curving light. Kq^2/d^2>\/=Gm^2/d^2 is charge curving gravity.
I'll simplify it though in terms of humanity. The light is our internal makeup, the gravity is our body, and the charge is our aura that surrounds our body. In macro the charge would be the closed universe that has gravity bodies within it and imaginary light bodies within the real bodies.
I don't believe relative mechanics and quantum mechanics are theories any longer but rather principles governing an overlying uncertainty law whose full extent of physical interpretations is constantly changing depending upon the strength of the charge and gravity fields involved.
Why was it Ptolemy vs Galileo? Why couldn't Heaviside fathom Maxwell's quaternions? Why'd Einstein take out background space and absolute time from the Lorentz theory? Why'd Tesla and Von Neuman think they were hip enough to put an electromagnetic bottle around the Eldridge? Why'd the Montauk kids do all their plausibly deniable buidness?
It's not that gravity hasn't been defined, it's that it's been driven underground. Free energy and perpetual motion tech are outlawed by the US patent board and obviously fossil fuels are killing the environ and ourselves. Only as long as Hollywood keeps us amused, with wars to keep us serious, and all manner of distraction in between, we'll all buy what John Locke says about the masses being too uninformed and maintain the ltd democrazy yoked to scare city ignoring the defintion of 1/0 the undefined.
What do you think 1/0 is? What're the other quantum stats?
We'd get the wave cone E^2/c>\/=h^2/16pi^2qt then just divide a photon. E^2/hc>\/=h/16pi^2qt. We're just assuming that energy per distance E^2/hc becomes force that's classically Gm1m2/d^2>\/=h/16pi^2qt. Yet that's just the quantum uncertainty gravitational force.
Gm1m2/d>\/=hd/16pi^2qt that's Gm1m2/d>\/=hc/16pi^2q is the gravitational uncertainty energy. Gm1m2/cd>\/=h/16pi^2q is gravitational uncertainty momentum.
So classically gravity appears to be force, specially gravity appears to be energy, and generally gravity appears to be momentum. I could go into rigorous explanations but gravity's simply curving light. If I was to say that assuming repulsive charge Kq^2/d^2>\/=h/16pi^2qt then charge would be curving light. Kq^2/d^2>\/=Gm^2/d^2 is charge curving gravity.
I'll simplify it though in terms of humanity. The light is our internal makeup, the gravity is our body, and the charge is our aura that surrounds our body. In macro the charge would be the closed universe that has gravity bodies within it and imaginary light bodies within the real bodies.
I don't believe relative mechanics and quantum mechanics are theories any longer but rather principles governing an overlying uncertainty law whose full extent of physical interpretations is constantly changing depending upon the strength of the charge and gravity fields involved.
Why was it Ptolemy vs Galileo? Why couldn't Heaviside fathom Maxwell's quaternions? Why'd Einstein take out background space and absolute time from the Lorentz theory? Why'd Tesla and Von Neuman think they were hip enough to put an electromagnetic bottle around the Eldridge? Why'd the Montauk kids do all their plausibly deniable buidness?
It's not that gravity hasn't been defined, it's that it's been driven underground. Free energy and perpetual motion tech are outlawed by the US patent board and obviously fossil fuels are killing the environ and ourselves. Only as long as Hollywood keeps us amused, with wars to keep us serious, and all manner of distraction in between, we'll all buy what John Locke says about the masses being too uninformed and maintain the ltd democrazy yoked to scare city ignoring the defintion of 1/0 the undefined.
What do you think 1/0 is? What're the other quantum stats?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #10052
by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
Don,
There is so much uncertainty in your definitions, that I'm wondering: why bother defining c^2.
Since you have brought divinity into your vague explanations, might I suggest that the God of lightning, Zeus, is responsible for c^2.
There is so much uncertainty in your definitions, that I'm wondering: why bother defining c^2.
Since you have brought divinity into your vague explanations, might I suggest that the God of lightning, Zeus, is responsible for c^2.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #9929
by Don Omni
Replied by Don Omni on topic Reply from
GD,
There's so much uncertainty in everything although I've already defined c^2 as the propagation rate of one second.
Yes, my planet is Jupiter and I'm born on the day of Sagittarius being the Hierophant because my element is Taurus so I'd be inclined to agree that the father of Apollo is responsible for c^2. Howev since Zeus's father was Chronos we can see where Zeus inherited his propagation rate DNA from due to Apollo's grandfather being the god of time.
If you find my explanations vague then simply understand that I'm not going to play all my trump in one fool gambit to appease anyone espescially on a site this close to the Capitol.
Although I did respond to your question, quantitatively and qualitatively, regarding what I think gravity is, would you please at least have the cordiality to respond to my question on what you think the undefined 1/0 and the quantum stats are?
Thanks, GD.
There's so much uncertainty in everything although I've already defined c^2 as the propagation rate of one second.
Yes, my planet is Jupiter and I'm born on the day of Sagittarius being the Hierophant because my element is Taurus so I'd be inclined to agree that the father of Apollo is responsible for c^2. Howev since Zeus's father was Chronos we can see where Zeus inherited his propagation rate DNA from due to Apollo's grandfather being the god of time.
If you find my explanations vague then simply understand that I'm not going to play all my trump in one fool gambit to appease anyone espescially on a site this close to the Capitol.
Although I did respond to your question, quantitatively and qualitatively, regarding what I think gravity is, would you please at least have the cordiality to respond to my question on what you think the undefined 1/0 and the quantum stats are?
Thanks, GD.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #9888
by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
Don,
Any physical process described with quantum mechanics, electrodynamics, chemistry, and all the others... predicts the the behavior of atomic and subatomic systems in a very short time frame and very short distances.
It seems that this physical theory was expressly formulated to remove gravity/entropy/heat from the observations of the atom's behavior for the very long time frame, the very long distances.
Quantum physics can predict the probability of position and energy state of subatomic systems, but cannot give an answer to WHY it accelerates or loses energy.
Why are particles (or energy) expelled at velocities close to the speed of light at the center of galaxies ? What is the mechanism which makes this happen ?
I think gravity should be included in quantum THEORIES (there are several interpretations).
Any physical process described with quantum mechanics, electrodynamics, chemistry, and all the others... predicts the the behavior of atomic and subatomic systems in a very short time frame and very short distances.
It seems that this physical theory was expressly formulated to remove gravity/entropy/heat from the observations of the atom's behavior for the very long time frame, the very long distances.
Quantum physics can predict the probability of position and energy state of subatomic systems, but cannot give an answer to WHY it accelerates or loses energy.
Why are particles (or energy) expelled at velocities close to the speed of light at the center of galaxies ? What is the mechanism which makes this happen ?
I think gravity should be included in quantum THEORIES (there are several interpretations).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #10188
by Don Omni
Replied by Don Omni on topic Reply from
GD,
Alright, I was merely curious as to your thoughts on what the undefined 1/0 and the actual quantum stats are.
In my opinion I believe galaxy centers expel particles because F/m=c^2/2.998x10^8d where acceleration is 2.998x10^8d/t^2. When the propagation rate of time, c^2, comes into contact with the pull of a singularity, c^2/2.998x10^8d, at a galaxy center then the temporal propagation is severly decelerated howev the 2.998x10^8d/t^2 is the 'escape horizon' accelerant that allows Hawking radiation particles to escape the event horizon of a black hole.
Singularities are like off the Richter so I'll show another example with Earth, then get back to the black hole. The acceleration due to gravity on Earth is 9.8d/t^2 so F/m=c^2/9.8d thus the propagation rate of time is barely decelerated at all to 9.2x10^15d/t^2. The earth is 5.9x10^24m so the force due to the deceleration of the propagation rate of time is 5.4x10^40V whereas the typical force 5.9x10^24mx2.9x10^8d/t^2 is 1.7x10^33V. I believe that the force due to the deceleration of time is the Voltage which is absorbed by Earth and the typical force is the Voltage radiated by Earth. Basically time is absorbed due to the pull of gravity fields and space is radiated due to the pull of charge fields that lie outside gravity fields.
Now, back to the singularity at the center of everything. The mechanism that expels particles at the acceleration due to light speed in my example is actually the charge field using classical force to siphon from the mass of the black hole itself in order to radiate space into the escape horizon outside the event horizon. Technically the charge field, the void of outer space itself, attracts singularity mass. Obviously if more space is radiated than time is absorbed then the singularity will evaporate or cease to exist.
Alright, I was merely curious as to your thoughts on what the undefined 1/0 and the actual quantum stats are.
In my opinion I believe galaxy centers expel particles because F/m=c^2/2.998x10^8d where acceleration is 2.998x10^8d/t^2. When the propagation rate of time, c^2, comes into contact with the pull of a singularity, c^2/2.998x10^8d, at a galaxy center then the temporal propagation is severly decelerated howev the 2.998x10^8d/t^2 is the 'escape horizon' accelerant that allows Hawking radiation particles to escape the event horizon of a black hole.
Singularities are like off the Richter so I'll show another example with Earth, then get back to the black hole. The acceleration due to gravity on Earth is 9.8d/t^2 so F/m=c^2/9.8d thus the propagation rate of time is barely decelerated at all to 9.2x10^15d/t^2. The earth is 5.9x10^24m so the force due to the deceleration of the propagation rate of time is 5.4x10^40V whereas the typical force 5.9x10^24mx2.9x10^8d/t^2 is 1.7x10^33V. I believe that the force due to the deceleration of time is the Voltage which is absorbed by Earth and the typical force is the Voltage radiated by Earth. Basically time is absorbed due to the pull of gravity fields and space is radiated due to the pull of charge fields that lie outside gravity fields.
Now, back to the singularity at the center of everything. The mechanism that expels particles at the acceleration due to light speed in my example is actually the charge field using classical force to siphon from the mass of the black hole itself in order to radiate space into the escape horizon outside the event horizon. Technically the charge field, the void of outer space itself, attracts singularity mass. Obviously if more space is radiated than time is absorbed then the singularity will evaporate or cease to exist.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 years 6 months ago #9934
by GD
Replied by GD on topic Reply from
Don,
I could not have said it any better.
Time deceleration and singularity is exactly what the entropy theory is about.
The singularity is the lowest potential point of a massive system such as a galaxy.
The arrow of time points in that direction and reaches almost zero at its center. Space is curved around such points as it defines the flow of matter/energy.
In other words, the only possible direction for matter is to reach a zero potential - matter continually tries to "ground" itself.
I could not have said it any better.
Time deceleration and singularity is exactly what the entropy theory is about.
The singularity is the lowest potential point of a massive system such as a galaxy.
The arrow of time points in that direction and reaches almost zero at its center. Space is curved around such points as it defines the flow of matter/energy.
In other words, the only possible direction for matter is to reach a zero potential - matter continually tries to "ground" itself.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.631 seconds