- Thank you received: 0
Theory of Replication
15 years 11 months ago #20294
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Wow John
I read the ESA report and you are right [url] www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM0L6OVGJE_index_0.html [/url]
So John do you think that electrons and positrons spinning at the speed of light inside Quarks, with the shape of a torus,and gravitons
and anti gravitons are moving threw the centers ?
Im working on a 14.8 Ghz simulation computer right now
I should be done with it soon....
so your thinking that it would be necessary to simulate the backwards time flow into it too?
MARX
I read the ESA report and you are right [url] www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM0L6OVGJE_index_0.html [/url]
So John do you think that electrons and positrons spinning at the speed of light inside Quarks, with the shape of a torus,and gravitons
and anti gravitons are moving threw the centers ?
Im working on a 14.8 Ghz simulation computer right now
I should be done with it soon....
so your thinking that it would be necessary to simulate the backwards time flow into it too?
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cosmicsurfer
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 11 months ago #23501
by cosmicsurfer
Replied by cosmicsurfer on topic Reply from John Rickey
Hi Marx, Yes---I agree with your statement regarding proton model. Your simulation software sounds great! If you can put a new spin on proton simulation that would be awesome, because I just did a search and found nothing close to what we are talking about. Even the HERA proton looks chaotic and is not organized around a torus and input/output central energy distribution plasma. Take a look at the Rodin torus his math reveals some hyperdimensional geometries. I had some discussions with Stoat on graviton frequency rectification in atoms and the interfacing with reverse time and posted some really interesting pics of plasmoid structures.
The rigid structure formations of matter are forged from the gravitomagnetic relationships between sub particles and atomic lattice from graviton capture circulating in magnetic fields. The graviton energy distribution process should have a central plasma distribution with paired particles moving around a torus. This is a three phased system that cycles energy in both directions and we only see the neutral phase in the middle which is the forward time 'light speed' component of left hand charges, we are blind to right hand charges.
No one has come up with an active model of the proton that has internal motion paired with large scale graviton motion. John
The rigid structure formations of matter are forged from the gravitomagnetic relationships between sub particles and atomic lattice from graviton capture circulating in magnetic fields. The graviton energy distribution process should have a central plasma distribution with paired particles moving around a torus. This is a three phased system that cycles energy in both directions and we only see the neutral phase in the middle which is the forward time 'light speed' component of left hand charges, we are blind to right hand charges.
No one has come up with an active model of the proton that has internal motion paired with large scale graviton motion. John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 11 months ago #15674
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Here are some new equations that I have been working on and they show something very interesting!!
Proton Compton wavelength h/mc = 1.321409855588x10^-15
Electron Compton wavelength h/mc = 2.42631023816x10^-12
....2.42631023816x10^-12/2187 = 1.10942*10^-15
Proton Compton wavelength = 1.32140*10^-15
from this point of view the electron looks bigger then the proton...
and 2187 electrons and positrons would actually have a smaller wavelength
with the mass being the opposite 1836 - 2187 = 351 too big
and the energy seems a little much too...
ProtonMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 1.50328*10^-10
ElectronMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 8.1871*10^-14
.....ProtonMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 1.50328*10^-10
8.187104382405225`*^-14 * 2187 = 1.79052*10^-10
I have been thinking about the gravitomagnetic pressure
and have an idea for it ....
E = mc^2 and the derivative would be 2c^m
I look at this in a geometrical way ..with two lines parallel the length of the speed of light and the mass completing the length of the surface area ..perhaps indicating two dimensions
I have been thinking that E = mc^2 describes one view of the matter
maybe 2c^m will work out to show the missing part...
this is the electron mass * 2187
2187*9.10938215`*10^-31 = 1.99222*10^-27
2*299792458^1.9922218762050002`*10^-27 = 1.54432*10^-10
.....................ProtonMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 1.50328*10^-10
MARX
Proton Compton wavelength h/mc = 1.321409855588x10^-15
Electron Compton wavelength h/mc = 2.42631023816x10^-12
....2.42631023816x10^-12/2187 = 1.10942*10^-15
Proton Compton wavelength = 1.32140*10^-15
from this point of view the electron looks bigger then the proton...
and 2187 electrons and positrons would actually have a smaller wavelength
with the mass being the opposite 1836 - 2187 = 351 too big
and the energy seems a little much too...
ProtonMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 1.50328*10^-10
ElectronMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 8.1871*10^-14
.....ProtonMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 1.50328*10^-10
8.187104382405225`*^-14 * 2187 = 1.79052*10^-10
I have been thinking about the gravitomagnetic pressure
and have an idea for it ....
E = mc^2 and the derivative would be 2c^m
I look at this in a geometrical way ..with two lines parallel the length of the speed of light and the mass completing the length of the surface area ..perhaps indicating two dimensions
I have been thinking that E = mc^2 describes one view of the matter
maybe 2c^m will work out to show the missing part...
this is the electron mass * 2187
2187*9.10938215`*10^-31 = 1.99222*10^-27
2*299792458^1.9922218762050002`*10^-27 = 1.54432*10^-10
.....................ProtonMass*SpeedOfLight^2 = 1.50328*10^-10
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 11 months ago #20296
by Stoat
Replied by Stoat on topic Reply from Robert Turner
Have a read of this on the toroidal electron.
guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/book/06.html
Some people might not have noticed that there is a link to a pdf file on that ESA web page given. It goes into the detail of the article. Top right hand corner of the page.
Some people might not have noticed that there is a link to a pdf file on that ESA web page given. It goes into the detail of the article. Top right hand corner of the page.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 11 months ago #15694
by Jim
Replied by Jim on topic Reply from
MARX, When you do math work on the constant "h" you need to consider the units involved. h equals mc^2 times time or jxs and if it is divided by mc you get c times time whatever thats worth. In any event you don't get meters from doing that math work on h.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
15 years 11 months ago #15695
by evolivid
Replied by evolivid on topic Reply from Mark Baker
Hey Jim are you sure thats what it says in my encyclopedia.. ???
Quantity***************************Symbol************Numerical value********************unit**Relative uncertainty
Proton Compton wavelength**********h/mpc*************1.3214098555(88)x10^-15**************m*************6.7x10^-9
so what does the "m" stand for here....., this is straight from the book....
MARX
Quantity***************************Symbol************Numerical value********************unit**Relative uncertainty
Proton Compton wavelength**********h/mpc*************1.3214098555(88)x10^-15**************m*************6.7x10^-9
so what does the "m" stand for here....., this is straight from the book....
MARX
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.278 seconds