Carina, a playground for pairing black holes

Hi John,

In my model, anti matter is not possible because the vacuum is supposed to have an internal chirality, the chirality of the vacuum lattice. left or rigth.
Electrons and Positrons are supposed to be produced around black hole horizons, forming direct hydrogen atoms by this chiral system.

Splitting of black holes is not the same as splitting of atoms.
Fission and fusion is also in my model only related to atomic nuclei and not for BH nulcei.
Atomic nuclei are in my model supposed to be based on complex spinning quarks. Quarks are supposed to be compound rigid elementary particles able to click on to each other. Quarks are composed out of one or more real propeller shaped electrons (for negative charged quarks) or positrons (for positive charged quarks) with one or more gluon-photons, see:

Rigid Elementary Click-On Particles, Propellers and Fields
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/01/i ntroduction.html

Black hole nuclei are based only on Higgs particles and gluon-photons compressed together by the incoming oscillating Higgs vacuum lattice forming a KNOTTY thing. They should come in all sizes, from Ball lightning up to Comet nuclei, Sunspots, Pairing Carina black holes, S-Nova black holes, Galaxy Anchor black holes, and the Big Crunch black hole.
I suppose that the evaporating Fractal Big bang black hole, is leaving smaller black holes behind which are the seeds to form galaxies between two pairing black holes. Smaller black holes are supposed to be produced only by Supernova explosions and the subsequent splitting processes like the Crab nebula we are talking about, or by interference of solar flares for comet production or lightning for ball lightning production.
For a rigid real particle based simple Black hole nucleus like a ball lightning see:
photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/1600/ 4%20Knots%2001-06%20015.1.jpg
Ball Lightning.
If the size of the BH-knot becomes bigger than the Vacuum 3D-tetraheral lattice length (the local Planck length) it influences the oscillations of the Higgs system (e.g. for Ball lightning nuclei).
As a result the BH nuclear knot is compressed together by these Higgs oscillations bouncing on the knot trying to destruct the knot, which is always the case for ball lightning, but not so immediate for Supernovae BH-nuclei.

The supernova BH nucleus.
The Supernova BH nucleus is of course much bigger than a ball lightning, in diameter so it will grow systematically by the absorption of the Higgs vacuum lattice. However due to two possible systems the SN Black hole will accelerate and migrate.

1e BH acceleration by a gas tail, mentioned before as is supposed to happen inside the nebula for the pairing of small BHs. I hope you will remember Fermions are repelled at the BH horizon due to a so called spin flip.
2e. BH-migration by other black holes located nearby influencing vacuum oscillations in an anti-symmetrical way. As a result the BH nucleus is supposed to become accelerated and move also out of the centre of the Nebula.
My suggestion is that this might be the origin of the dead Fox N 63a and Crab nebula.

Inside the dead Fox, we see at the edge of the nebula the splitting of what I suggest is the SN-black hole nucleus into multiple nuclei. At the same time there is a firm production of gas clouds!!. I will later try to explain the formation of complete hydrogen atoms around some BH horizons without the annihilation of all positrons and electrons produced at the same horizon by a sort of Hawking radiation.

I suppose that the SN-nucleus must have always an equilibrium between the inside pressure of the nuclear Higgs particles and the outside compression of the Higgs system. If the Higgs system changes its pressure ability due to additional external Black holes then the nucleus will change in diameter or will even explode, if the Higgs pressure has come to a critical minimum. It is a logical suggestion, that just in the middle between two black holes the Higgs vacuum pressure will dramatically decrease due to what I call Higgs-vacuum lensing.

For Higgs-vacuum lensing around one or two black holes. See:
bp2.blogger.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Reb9fZHVbEI/AA AAAAAAAEs/_yYaO2WdMVc/s1600-h/webblog+1+2+BH+butte rflies+4.jpg

I hope you are aware that this is a short rough answer, for more see:
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
and perhaps my old site for the Big Bang Black Hole evaporation:
home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#app endix40
and
home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/

Leo Vuyk.

Hi Leo, Is your Higgs Field an FTL motion or a scalar field? There is far too much motion in Universe for there not to be an FTL communications taking place, otherwise gravity would not be instantaneous. So, how do you account for gravity if FTL motion in your model does not exist? You cannot calculate orbits using light speed. So, your black hole is just a compression jet with zero antimatter? If so, then how do you account for so much antimatter existing around galactic bubble and annihilation hot spots?

Matter dominates Antimatter in forward time. Do you have a reverse time matrix where Antimatter dominates matter? Obviously, the system works otherwise life could not have evolved and for the most part 99% of mass is made out of matter. Exceptions are found within atoms,i.e., protons quark and antiquark paired motions [spin at 3 trillion times per second], that observation alone reveals how most likely the greater Universe functions to maintain constant motion. In your model the continuous creation depends on a big bang? Gravitostatic fields allow for creation to take place without feeling the greater motion of the entire orchestration of cosmos. However, the facts are that galaxies move through space at extreme speeds 1.4 million miles per hour!!! You cannot have that kind of motion without something going very fast circulating through the system.

Nice graphics on your site, you did some major work! John

Hi Leo, Is your Higgs Field an FTL motion or a scalar field? There is far too much motion in Universe for there not to be an FTL communications taking place, otherwise gravity would not be instantaneous. So, how do you account for gravity if FTL motion in your model does not exist? You cannot calculate orbits using light speed. So, your black hole is just a compression jet with zero antimatter? If so, then how do you account for so much antimatter existing around galactic bubble and annihilation hot spots?

---

Yes, Faster than light, is incorporated in the photon information transfer by the Higgs sytem which seems to be able to MIMIC relativity rules by a system of "anti symmetrical oscillation"or a Local Anti Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Field ( LASOF)
However I doubt about that the speed of the graviton should be much faster, because my proposal is that the sun is accompanied by two black holes ( Stellar Anchor black holes ( SABHs)which are supposed to be responsible for the pioneer anomalies and extra gravity for the orbit of the planets.

---

Matter dominates Antimatter in forward time. Do you have a reverse time matrix where Antimatter dominates matter? Obviously, the system works otherwise life could not have evolved and for the most part 99% of mass is made out of matter. Exceptions are found within atoms,i.e., protons quark and antiquark paired motions [spin at 3 trillion times per second], that observation alone reveals how most likely the greater Universe functions to maintain constant motion. In your model the continuous creation depends on a big bang?

---

an evaporating and Big Bang black hole nucleus splitting off so called galaxy anchor black holes.see my former mail.

---

Gravitostatic fields allow for creation to take place without feeling the greater motion of the entire orchestration of cosmos. However, the facts are that galaxies move through space at extreme speeds 1.4 million miles per hour!!! You cannot have that kind of motion without something going very fast circulating through the system.

---

Gravity is the result of the balancing impulses between Higgs particle scattering and graviton scattering with fermions.

---

Nice graphics on your site, you did some major work! John

---

Thank you Tom.

Leo.

Carina pairing of black holes seems to be a small example of Galaxy formation and complexity.

Galaxy Form and complexity by addition of dual systems of NEW black holes.
The Sombrero galaxy (M 104) is seeded with soft x-ray point sources. The majority of the most distant point sources can be supposed to represent so called Galaxy Anchor Black Holes. As is predicted by the NEW black hole model, these points can be symmetrical connected by lines going through the centre of the galaxy, just as is described for complex Galaxy formation based on Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)
bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/0...-is-not-able-to.html

Leo Vuyk.

Hi Leo, I looked at your graphs again and I disagree that Cygnas A has two anchor black holes. You have your label on the central black hole as a white hole, which it is not there are two jets of antimatter streaming towards two hot annihilation zones which you have labeled as anchor black holes-Annihilation Zones are radio sources. Maybe Antimatter jets do somehow initiate possible galactic circulations, however they are not black holes!!!

I also disagree that dark matter exists. GR is invalid due to the speed of graviton at minimum 20 billion times light. So, you do not need to have dark matter to account for faster then expected rotations of mass. Since of course the error in that logic is due to thinking that curvature of space around mass creates gravity and effects time which is not correct. Space is flat, only fields of particles in motion in space may curve around mass since space is not a thing it is emptyness-nothing.

1.) What is a White Hole? 2.) What is a black Hole? 3) How can an Antimatter Jet Annihilation Zone be a Black Hole? John

I do not remember that I used th word antimatter annihilation zone.

A NEW "WHITE HOLE", is the vacuum point just in between two NEW black holes. This vacuum point is supposed to suffer the most deformation of the Higgs vacuum lattice due to the absorbtion of the two NEW black holes. Out Sun as the remnant of an old open star cluster is an example.

NEW BLACK HOLES. Black holes are supposed to be particle graveyards with a real particle nucleus containing real particles, densely packed together by the Higgs pressure from outside, not able to emit graviton information outside the horizon, because the Higgs lattice including the Higgs energy, is absorbed by the black hole nucleus. This could be called a constant Casimir pressure.
Black holes do not emit photon information like graviton information, as a consequence, they have NO MASS, nothing (no Fermions) are supposed to spin by Higgs scattering inside the Black hole nucleus.
Conclusion: Only real spinning Fermions can have mass, by emitting gravity photon information. As a consequence, Gravity is not only a feature of the scattering pushing influence of Gravitons on Fermions, but also the counter balancing pressure of the Higgs system

HIGGS PARTICLES, are supposed to have a specific FORM and to be the origin of all other particles (the God particle) by a simple change by collision of their rigid FORM. Thus Fermions and Photons have also real rigid different form. Higgs particles are supposed to oscillate with a Universal defined constant frequency along a Three-Dimensional shaped network of triangular shaped lattices having the Planck length (with variable length around black holes) . All Higgs particles oscillate with the same cycle through the universe but with variable speed dependent of the vacuum lattice length. The lattice length is forced to vary in the neighborhood of black holes due to the absorption of Higgs particles by black holes.

FERMIONS are form-changed Higgs particles supposed to have a real propeller shape and are able to become a double spin state by Higgs scattering which is coming in from directions according to the so called oscillating vacuum lattice, which is triangular in its basic form. Some specific Photons are supposed to have the ability to merge or click on with the propeller shaped Fermions, to produce Quarks. Fermions are supposed to spin outside the vacuum lattice but energized and driven to spin , by the continuous scattering with the Higgs particles. Each collision with a Fermion does change one real Higgs particles program into a Higgs particle with a particular photon quality depending on the angle of scattering attack of the Higgs to the Fermion. Thus the spin and "eigen energy" of the Fermion has come from the Higgs field.

PHOTONS, are Higgs particles with a photon memory. The vacuum is a ultra dense energetic oscillating lattice of REAL Higgs particles, which are able to transport photon information like graviton-, electric,- magnetic and etc. etc along the lattice. There is no need that the REAL form of the Higgs particle during Photon transportation through the vacuum is transformed into the real photonic shape. ONLY at the moment of scattering with Fermions the shape of the Higgs particle should change into the real photonic shape to be able to transfer a force by scattering or by merging (e.g. Gluons). Thus each Higgs particle should have a Photonic memory.

HIGGS IMPULSE VECTOR HEDGEHOG. Despite the triangular form of the vacuum lattice on average we may assume that the Higgs oscillations have a random globular impulse on a Fermion. However if some Higgs particles are programmed as a photon, then the impulse Hedgehog changes and will transfer a one sided force on the Fermion (e.g. gravity magnetic- electric forces)
MASS is the variable (variable by Lorentz-transformation) capacity of real spinning Fermions, to change real scattering Higgs particles into the same number of Higgs-Graviton-Photon particles with a specific graviton memory.

MOTION, (through the oscillating vacuum lattice frame) is the (Lorentz-transformed) capacity of real spinning Fermions, to change scattering Higgs particles into as much Higgs/Photon particles in all directions but in NON-equal numbers around the spin polarized Fermion. The spin polarization of the Fermion relative to the vacuum lattice is supposed to be the origin of polarized emission of gravitons and also the origin of real mass increase and length contraction of atoms.

ACCELERATION, (through the oscillating vacuum lattice frame) is the (Lorentz-transformed) capacity of real spinning Fermions, to change scattering Higgs particles into as much Higgs/Photon particles in all directions but in NON-equal numbers around the spin polarized Fermion. The numbers of emitted Higgs-Photon particles into the direction of motion are supposed to increase relative to the amount of acceleration. (Synchrotron radiation )

QUANTUM GRAVITY, is the balancing result between the impulse differences of Higgs and Higgs-Graviton photonic scattering on spinning Fermions. If represented as a non-globular impulse vector field around the Fermion we could call this a anti-symmetrical Gravity Hedgehog.
. (for alternative Feynman diagrams see:
bp2.blogger.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/R2A0GNUIcnI/AA AAAAAAAVo/WjsaUakspFI/s1600-h/feynman+graviton+2a. jpg
)
Thank you for your attention.