Creation ex nihilo

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">No, his question was specifically about your fundamental "particle".<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thats not true in the least, which makes me question your reading and comprehension skills. He was referring to the smallest particle, if there was one. For the most part, Tom is not the least bit interested in anyones theory but his own. [] Surely you must know this, as you have been here for a few years. So why would Tom be asking me about my ideas regarding a fundamental particle? There is no sign of that in his post either.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">This means you know that the &lt;stuff&gt; you are posting here is not understandable in its present form. And yet you post it without making any attempt to explain what you really mean.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> That's not true either. I do know that you can't understand it. I also know that you don't wish to, and there is certainly nothing wrong with hoping someone else does understand.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> "what does Skarp mean when he says this-or-that particular word?"<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Certainly you will never know, because that goes to those that make the attempt at an understanding. I told Tom something like this a few years back, that I'm not his bellboy or hired help he has to lift a finger every once in a while. I'm not going to feed you with a spoon.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">The only appropriate response at this point is for you to post definitions and/or explanations of all the words and phrases you believe could be misunderstood by someone that is not an expert on your idea.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Maybe you should have said something like this earlier, and avoided playing this twit like game you seem to enjoy.

You know - This board is for all intensive purposes ... dead to the world. It's been that way for over a year. You would think that it would be exciting if someone showed up and recited Mary had a little lamb, for lack of anything else. Yet you spit in the face of those with ideas that you can't understand.
Hello!
Whats wrong with this picture?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">You could not be interacting with the Moon if nothing was colliding. In Meta Science, classical gravitons blocked by you and the Moon are doing the colliding.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Lets bring up that question once again. How is motion possible in an infinitely composed universe?

This one is really puzzeling:

[Skarp] "Tom's question was in regards to marbles. Since there are no marbles in an the analogous way he considers marbles to be, at least from my standpoint, <u><b>there really is no point in answering in a way that would be to his liking</u></b>."

Whether he likes your answer or not is irrelevant in this sort of discussion, so why would you care?. Oh, yeah. You don't, but you need something to point at to draw our attention away.

The only thing that really matters is whether or not he (and by extension, others) understands your answer. Some of the best [most important/significant/etc.] answers I've ever gotten were answers that I did not like, at first. Experience teaches you to look again.

===

Of course that point of view assumes that you are actually interested in communicating your idea to other minds. If, as I suspect, you are just blowing smoke then it is not important to you whether or not others understand.

Have you tried USENET?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><u><b>there really is no point in answering in a way that would be to his liking</u></b>."<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Since you found this important to hilight. I have to ask ..... Which part did you not understand? Why would I answer to something that both he and I would agree on under the context of the question?

You know Larry - The problem here is not me, because I'm not even remotely trolling. The problem is you, for you are a thread hijacker. Thats right larry ... you are a terrorist[]

The subject is Creation ex nihilo. Most of it revolves around nothing. I am dead on point regarding this matter. In fact I consider myself to be somewhat of an expert on this subject. So don't expect me to take some back seat to you.

Real experts enjoy sharing their knowledge. When someone asks for a definition, or clarification of some detail, the true expert takes extra care to be sure the student learns as much as possible.

Trolls on the other hand will bob and weave, evade and obfuscate, when asked for a detail.

===

Hmmm. You claim to be an expert on nothing. (Or is it NOTHING? I wonder what the difference is?) Kind of a long winded joke for such a so-so punch line. But I get it.

NOTE - It would be easy for you to prove me wrong, and if you do I will appologize.

All you have to do is show me that you do in fact have definitions/explanations for the things we have asked you about.