Big Crunch?

Well Jim my model begins from nothing, or I should say the only nothing possible. An infinate homogenous energy field, essentually an infinate neutron with no quantum or particle properties (Dr. VF cringes). This is my definition of t=0, it is the only t=0 that is possible that could have become our Universe. The mass our Universe contains must have always been present. At t=0 there could be no matter, or there would be no t=0, which my model assumes did exist. E=mc sq. shows that it could have been pure energy, but only in a form with no density or charge differenciation.

The BB was actually a decay of this energy field into a paradigm of opposite charge. The decay occured at less than the speed of light in a spherical chain reaction manner with opposite but equal charges maintaining conservation and a gross charge of "0". This is when electrodynamics took over and began to generate vorticies and compress the energy utilizing QM and thus generating matter. As matter began to develope, so did gravity. The gravity eventuall caught the decay and stopped it, essentually closing our Universe. At this point there were voticies throughout the system as Orlov described in his paper and a Universal one at the center of the sphere. More matter accumulated at the center of the sphere and then moved to the edge of the sphere where it was least dense, thus generating a funnel shaped Universe.

That is my hypothesis in a nutshell. Since, I have began serious discussion of my ideas on this site, the work of Dr. Steiner's geometry and the latest paper by Orluv have been released. I am certainly glad others are persueing the technical issues I am unable to calculate.

The plasma theory has lots of aerodynamic and fluid mechanics work, which is very interestiong. Although most plasma theories are static I think. My model has all matter crashing together ultimately in a big crunch, which will also be a big rip, returning all the matter back to its original charged energy. I think ultimately there will be a single meta atom that will be perpetual as there will be no friction in which it can interfere. Were there other areas of decay in the Universe.....I do not know, but I have no reason to believe that what was essentually a single "neutron" at t=0 would begin to decay in more than a single location. But I certainly cannot say it did not or will not.

rousejohnny

what do you mean by "that most plasmic theories are static"?

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />rousejohnny

what do you mean by "that most plasmic theories are static"?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

The one I know about out of S. California I think is static as in Einstein's notion. I certainly could be wrong.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by north</i>
<br />rousejohnny

what do you mean by "that most plasmic theories are static"?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

The one I know about out of S. California I think is static as in Einstein's notion. I certainly could be wrong.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

---

plasma is farrrrrrrrrrrr from static, i suggest you go the web site and read through it PROPERLY. it was quite apparent that you have not done this. could you tell me right now what plasma is?

also did you know that plasma considered the FOURTH state of matter and plasma being the first state?

you have much to learn on this subject,when you get there and READ!! you will understand.

I see that these pioneers make no reference to a beginning or end. Thanks for pointing this out. I am not sure intergalactic space is full of plasma. If the galaxies are the recombination or compression of some basic homogenous plasma, density differenciation could exist within a closed system that COULD vacuum it. But, I think this is conjecture on their part as they do not visualize their model in terms of a basic beginning state. So this flaw is so because it is presumptuous, but their could be plasma in intersteller space, but it would be extremely diffuse.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rousejohnny</i>

I see that these pioneers make no reference to a beginning or end.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

actually most think infinity,one person did give a number to the 18th power,can't remember who though.


<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> I am not sure intergalactic space is full of plasma.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

actually they say that the universe is 99% plasma.

just to give you an idea,the solar-wind is a plasma,then include all other Stars,Galaxies and Quasars etc.,well..it's not hard to see.


<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> If the galaxies are the recombination or compression of some basic homogenous plasma,<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

the distribution of plasma is not homogenous.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> density differenciation could exist within a closed system that COULD vacuum it<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">.

what the heck does that mean!!

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> But, I think this is conjecture on their part as they do not visualize their model in terms of a basic beginning state.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

depends on what you mean,from what i understand, so far, plasma is the FIRST state of matter then gas,liquid,solid. in otherwords plasma is the essence of all atoms and their inner constituents.

So this flaw is so because it is presumptuous, but their could be plasma in intersteller space, but it would be extremely diffuse.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

and you are not being presumptuous?

easy there guy!! your sounding a little arrogant.and you have no idea what these people are talking about.

to ignor plasma's i think would be huge mistake,up to you.

i myself have much more to read.