<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">What is your opinion about this picture?:[Marduk]<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I tried cropping these objects from the raw data and got the same thing you have, so no need to post them again. My opinion is that the resolution (4.25 m/p) is not good enough to see if this is a possible artificial object or not. The one on the left "looks" like a rectangular opening in a building with a dark gabled roof, viewed at an oblique angle of about 45 degrees.
But I'm not comfortable with that. The reason is that at image center the emmision (camera) angle is 0.19, almost directly overhead. True, the object is not at image center, but it is close (about 10 km away) to it.
What we think we are seeing "looks" like an oblique angle shot of the building, but that is at variance with the data. So I would say we need a better look to see (or guess at) anything more.
Neil
