A Geoglyph re-imaged... Parrotopia

I agree may and is are all I intend in these types of discussions, don't know until you get there for certain about any of this. I'm always tickled however by how the general paradigm keeps changing in science as an overall comment. We do keep discovering that the impossible is possible.

With regards to the faces you mention David Hutchinson provided this to the Anomaly Hunters study in August 2003, he used the name Speaker if that jogs any memories.

Context image:



Annotated image:



I know that off site linking is discouraged here but I would ask if you ever went through the roundtable study we did on the parrot at anomaly hunters? I can certainly send you the link via private email if you'd like, It does contain some serious and some rather 'out there' stuff but I always encouraged people to express themselves and just figured I'd have to deal with some of the more weird stuff with a smile. Funny thing over the past 6 years doing this on the net I've found some of the weird stuff to be more true than the average claims.

Jim Miller, You can find anything if you want to!

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Turn the city crop so it has west on top on the screen, there are some interesting faces in the city itself with some pretty good definition, especially in the eyes and nose areas, good that is, considering the resolution of the raw data M14 image.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

M1401285, multifaceted profile.



M1401285, Egyptian profile



Neil

Hi Neil.

Speaking of "faces," early on in this research a member of the Anomaly Hunter’s group found a large head profile within the City Complex - just above the avian glyph.



Note the deep set eyes, the triangular nose and slim mouth with puckered lips that forms a left facing head.

Zip Monster

Just parrot ?

ANd lord said know what is in front of you and what is hidden will be revealed..

At the risk of sounding both stupid and insulting, has anyone been a photograph analyzer for military satellites, or know of such a person? They might have experience in what artificial objects look like. Consider that camouflage efforts may parallel actual damage in appearance.

Gregg Wilson

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by starjim</i>
Look across the river of the city area, the bank of that 'river' forms the profile of a baby.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

*jim,

I did a little playing around with the two image strips, and came up with this. It's more like a Warrior, or "Protector" than a baby. This is oriented with west up, and shown so that we can see him, rather than the city. The city is sitting just on the left edge of the image. Note in the S20 image that the "Animal" part looks outward away from the city, while the Protector looks at the city.

S20


S20 Colorized


M14 (note that the Animal disappears - try as I might, I can't bring out any of him)


Let it not be said that I can't still find faces with the best of them.

BTW, one gets the impression that the profile is undercut on all three of these.



rd