Nefertiti's Family

Holy cow.

And, um, thanks. I definitely was not seeing it before, but now it is clear.

Emanuel

Wait a minute! Oh my God! This is really incredible! Compare closely this full-view with Tom's original "key" to Nefertiti here (slide 42).

www.metaresearch.org/solar%20system/cydo...act_html/default.htm

I remember that Tom had outlined a body for Nefertiti, and was wondering if it overlapped with the supposed "woman" in your key above. The "woman" looks so mangled up that I thought perhaps it was not really a woman but just a trick of light and shadow, especially because this was where Tom and others had originally saw an "arm" for Nefertiti.

Well, to my utter amazement when I compared your key to Tom's original Nefertiti key I realized that Kefertiti's "hand" is grasping the woman's head right on top, as if my the hair. Then it dawned on me that the reason the "woman" is mangled might be because it is actually severed head, and Nefertiti is carrying it!!!

This is incredible you guys! I mean it is unmistakable. Nefertiti's hand is facing palm-down in a gripping shape right on top of the head, which she is holding slightly forward from her body. Again, take a look at the link above. And then compare it to your key as well as the original strip here:

www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e01_e06/full_jp...map/E05/E0501429.jpg
(note, the above link is much clearer on my monitor than the one posted in this thread up above).

Do other people see this!?

Emanuel

One characteristic of most of the flat art is that it is initially hard to see, but once you see it, it "locks in" and you can't miss it thereafter. This is a problem for presenters because they quickly forget how hard it was to see initially because it is so "obvious" now.

My wife, who is an artist and a skeptic, was impressed with the leftmost face because it was so anatomically correct (proportions, relative feature locations). -|Tom|-

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by emanuel</i>
<br />Well, to my utter amazement when I compared your key to Tom's original Nefertiti key I realized that Kefertiti's "hand" is grasping the woman's head right on top, as if my the hair. Then it dawned on me that the reason the "woman" is mangled might be because it is actually severed head, and Nefertiti is carrying it!!!

<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">No, I don't think so. If you look closely at the hand in Tom's key, and then compare what you think is the hand to the area of the forehead of the mother, in this green filtered image, you'll see that they are both the same thing.

{Image deleted temporarily} E0501429%20family%201_green.gif

rd

Tom,

What would disprove the artificiality of these features?

JR

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by jrich</i>
<br />What would disprove the artificiality of these features?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">If new images from a different viewing perspective, or new images with different lighting, made the impressions we have go away (as it does for faces in clouds and landscapes on Earth), most of us would agree that artificiality is falsified. (The converse result does not distinguish hypotheses.)

OTOH, when we get color imagery of this area at comparable resolution, if the colors correspond with image features (e.g., flesh tones for skin, etc.), most objective parties would agree that natural origin is falsified. (The converse result does not distinguish hypotheses because colors are more vulnerable to alteration by dust storms.)

In neither case is the conclusion absolute. But at any given moment, we must go with what is, in our judgment, the preponderance of the evidence. -|Tom|-