- Thank you received: 0
Planet of Art..
17 years 1 month ago #18189
by Trinket
Replied by Trinket on topic Reply from Bob
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 1 month ago #18190
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
This is amazing stuff, Trinket. Keep 'em coming!
I listened to the wave file, but where's the rest?
rd
I listened to the wave file, but where's the rest?
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 4 weeks ago #18321
by rderosa
Replied by rderosa on topic Reply from Richard DeRosa
Trinket, many of the images you have posted are really quite striking. While I'm never really convinced that anything is artificial, I have to admit that many of yours cry out for re-imaging by the HiRise. You say you've spent three plus years at this, so I assume that most of your work is pre-HiRise. Have you found any high resolution images from HiRise for any of your earlier work? Or, for that matter, are any of the ones you already posted from HiRise? At the end of this message, I'm going to give you a list of some of the images that would really be great to see from HiRise.
By the way, there's a simple way to give us the source image number. All you have to do is include it in the name of the jpg so that when we right click on the images and go to "properties" we would see the image id.
Here's my list of fascinating images that would be useful to see at higher resolutions. Since I don't know the image number, I'll give them according to the Page Number (from this thread) and Post Date and Time:
Page 1. Posted - 06 Aug 2007 : 23:28:01
Page 2. Posted - 09 Oct 2007 : 16:24:01
Page 2. Posted - 10 Oct 2007 : 04:06:31
Page 3. Posted - 11 Oct 2007 : 14:49:29
Page 4. Posted - 16 Oct 2007 : 18:00:09
Page 4. Posted - 17 Oct 2007 : 18:42:18
Page 4. Posted - 20 Oct 2007 : 21:37:11
Page 4. Posted - 22 Oct 2007 : 15:31:39
Page 4. Posted - 24 Oct 2007 : 01:05:09
Page 5. Posted - 03 Nov 2007 : 15:58:44
Page 6. Posted - 12 Nov 2007 : 21:01:07
If any of these already are from HiRise, the numbers would be helpful, although that would change my thinking somewhat since I believe pareidolia is not resolution specific. So, by seeing the original in high res, I don't think anything would be gained by reducing resolution, but if we start from low resolution, I think something would be gained by seeing the high resolution version of it later. Make sense?
Basically, since I believe you are not trying to prove your case in any way other than showing us images, which I can appreciate, I would like to take a look at a few first at low res, and then at high res to see what sort of impact that has on me.
rd
By the way, there's a simple way to give us the source image number. All you have to do is include it in the name of the jpg so that when we right click on the images and go to "properties" we would see the image id.
Here's my list of fascinating images that would be useful to see at higher resolutions. Since I don't know the image number, I'll give them according to the Page Number (from this thread) and Post Date and Time:
Page 1. Posted - 06 Aug 2007 : 23:28:01
Page 2. Posted - 09 Oct 2007 : 16:24:01
Page 2. Posted - 10 Oct 2007 : 04:06:31
Page 3. Posted - 11 Oct 2007 : 14:49:29
Page 4. Posted - 16 Oct 2007 : 18:00:09
Page 4. Posted - 17 Oct 2007 : 18:42:18
Page 4. Posted - 20 Oct 2007 : 21:37:11
Page 4. Posted - 22 Oct 2007 : 15:31:39
Page 4. Posted - 24 Oct 2007 : 01:05:09
Page 5. Posted - 03 Nov 2007 : 15:58:44
Page 6. Posted - 12 Nov 2007 : 21:01:07
If any of these already are from HiRise, the numbers would be helpful, although that would change my thinking somewhat since I believe pareidolia is not resolution specific. So, by seeing the original in high res, I don't think anything would be gained by reducing resolution, but if we start from low resolution, I think something would be gained by seeing the high resolution version of it later. Make sense?
Basically, since I believe you are not trying to prove your case in any way other than showing us images, which I can appreciate, I would like to take a look at a few first at low res, and then at high res to see what sort of impact that has on me.
rd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 4 weeks ago #19813
by Trinket
Replied by Trinket on topic Reply from Bob
Sorry about that
My apologies for not having the proper names/links..
I am working to correct them and will eventually provide the actual crops used to
make all the displays.. No one gets more confused with these unlabeled images than me..
I occasionally like to shoot myself in the foot ..
I did that on page one --- three .. after that all files have two sets of 4 numbers in the begining of the name.. those are the mro
names..
I will fix all of them ..asap
I'll will also try to link you to the original crops asap..
I need to copy them up to my server photobucket can't handle them..
Three Years = Spirit & Opie thats where I found my piece of truth.. Which I now wield with any image..
I look forward to others eventual understanding of the Mass=( 6.4185×1023 KG (0.107 Earths) deception..
Bob..
My apologies for not having the proper names/links..
I am working to correct them and will eventually provide the actual crops used to
make all the displays.. No one gets more confused with these unlabeled images than me..
I occasionally like to shoot myself in the foot ..
I did that on page one --- three .. after that all files have two sets of 4 numbers in the begining of the name.. those are the mro
names..
I will fix all of them ..asap
I'll will also try to link you to the original crops asap..
I need to copy them up to my server photobucket can't handle them..
Three Years = Spirit & Opie thats where I found my piece of truth.. Which I now wield with any image..
I look forward to others eventual understanding of the Mass=( 6.4185×1023 KG (0.107 Earths) deception..
Bob..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Zip Monster
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 3 weeks ago #18325
by Zip Monster
Replied by Zip Monster on topic Reply from George
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Zip Monster
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 3 weeks ago #18331
by Zip Monster
Replied by Zip Monster on topic Reply from George
Hello Trinket,
thanks for the info on the MRO image.
Now, is this the artistic formation that you saw ?
Viking Lord with Avian Headdress (with Key): MRO - PSP_001858_2195
This Geoglyph is located in the base of a gully at a southeast-facing slope of an impact crater in the Icaria area of Mars. (PSP_001858_2195)?
Notice the Viking profile has a deep-set eye, a partially damaged nose, full cheeks with mustache and a short beard. He wears a helmet with a hanging chinstrap and the number 3 insignia appears on the neck flap.
The avain headdress (which is also attached by straps) has a head, a long neck, a beak (which appears to be holding a small corn cob), and a wattle with a small face seen in profile. The "birds" main body consists of a large wing or a set of collected feathers.
Nice find!
Happy Thanksgiving
Zip Monster
thanks for the info on the MRO image.
Now, is this the artistic formation that you saw ?
Viking Lord with Avian Headdress (with Key): MRO - PSP_001858_2195
This Geoglyph is located in the base of a gully at a southeast-facing slope of an impact crater in the Icaria area of Mars. (PSP_001858_2195)?
Notice the Viking profile has a deep-set eye, a partially damaged nose, full cheeks with mustache and a short beard. He wears a helmet with a hanging chinstrap and the number 3 insignia appears on the neck flap.
The avain headdress (which is also attached by straps) has a head, a long neck, a beak (which appears to be holding a small corn cob), and a wattle with a small face seen in profile. The "birds" main body consists of a large wing or a set of collected feathers.
Nice find!
Happy Thanksgiving
Zip Monster
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.329 seconds