ESA Cydonia, Mars Image

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">For outside reasons of my own, I think that "humans", or equivalent, have been to Mars and perhaps inhabited it. In addition, Dr. Van Flandern's case for the original Cydonia Face being artificial looks to be air tight. However, in these above photographs: faces, figures, artwork are not apparent. I have to agree with Rich DeRosa on this matter. Artificial workings do not stand out.

Perhaps some of us are artistically deficient....

Gregg Wilson<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

I have to agree with this statement. This is why some of the discoverers of the most convincing artifacts on Mars have been opposed to a "proliferation of faces." That serves to help the advocates of "all is pareidolia" theory by means of dilution; by posting pareidolic images, and calling them "faces." This has been going on for some time now. It places the legitimate researchers in a more difficult position. [Neil DeRosa]

"Behold, the Lion of the tribe of Cydonia"



(do you see the large right facing lion's head?)

Zip Monster

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by neilderosa</i>
<br />It places the legitimate researchers in a more difficult position. [Neil DeRosa]<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I think the most interesting point along these lines, is something I've said right from the beginning.

"One man's legitimate researcher is another man's purveyor of dillution." rd

That's how pareidolia works.

rd

Walt,

We like to err on the side of tolerance, so I waited until complaints started showing up. You are posting off-topic material here. This is a science board. Religious aphorisms are inappropriate.

Moreover, your images appear to have no scientific content either. Without keys, most of us "artistically challenged" readers see only random terrain in the images you have posted.

Try to be specific about what you see, ideally by outlining it on a helper image. And please make some attempt at a scientific argument that it is more than pareidolia -- face-like shapes (or other special shapes) in natural terrain, which are quite common. Thank you. -|Tom|-

img] img509.imageshack.us/img509/5081/fomfriendspz7jt6.gif [/img]

******
******
******
Walt,
I have broken this image link ( by deleting the first square bracket) because the image is too wide for our processing systems and causes some problems.

Please try to find another image that is not as wide (width is the problem.)
******
******
******

Behind The Jesters Mask A Pair Of Jokers Wild


TripleD3