MI collisions

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">In MM, there are no actual collisions between constituent particles <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">In MM there are no particles to speak of. Any claimed particle shall be composed of an infinity of other claimed particles. Taken to conclusion - if this is even remotely possible ... said particle shall be reduced to nothing at all. Like you said - No collision is possible.

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">do the geometric points at the end of the Zeno chain ... collide?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Thats just it. There is no end to the chain by which a presentation can occur .... ala bing bang pow! Any presentation for collision is a contradiction to the infinitely composed.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">I see no viable logic in MM's collisional mechanism.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Perhaps you didn't know that one of the Ms in MM stands for Magic.

[Skarp] "In MM there are no particles to speak of. Any claimed particle shall be composed of an infinity of other claimed particles. Taken to conclusion - if this is even remotely possible ... said particle shall be reduced to nothing at all. Like you said - No collision is possible."

How can you guys keep missing the point? An electron is still an electron, despite the fact that it (and it's electrical field) is made of smaller parts.

The finite mass of an electron is divided among these parts. The idea that it is thus "... reduced to nothing at all" is laughable.

Ha Ha !!!

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">How can you guys keep missing the point? <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
This is EXACTLY what I'm getting at ;o)

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">I see no viable logic in MM's collisional mechanism. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

If you don't understand something then this doesn't make it wrong. []

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">If you don't understand something then this doesn't make it wrong.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">I do believe it is understood and thats what makes it wrong. Niether motion nor collision is possible in MM. I.E. All constituents are already in contact with no room to move. Gimmy a smidgin of space wherein to move and the problem is solved. Whats lacking here is a contradiction such as Existence opposed to Non-Existence. I cannot possibly know that I exist without a clear line drawn. No lines are possible in MM.