True Meta Science Needs No Measurments,

Is stonewalling silence any way to treat a poignient question? Hum?

Meta
rgrace@rgrace.org

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Meta</i>
<br />Is stonewalling silence any way to treat a poignient question? Hum?<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">It's philosophy, not science. You have the wrong Message Board for that subject. -|Tom|-

Your initial statement asserts the following:

1. Space is the fundament of all that seems to exist.
2. Space is dimensionless non-existence.
3. Space requires no measurements.
4. Space requires no measurers.
5. Any measurement only serves the measurers.

Then you ask "true or false". No one is interested in your question because none of us have any idea at all what you are trying to assert. You seem to post these smorgasborg questions like you have thrown down a gauntlet with the most challenging question of the century but some us simply have no idea on earth what point you are trying to make. Narrow your focus on a specific thing first, then work your way up to the master stroke.

Perhaps I should merely eliminate my request for your response by deleting the "True or False" statement.

Meta

X

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Meta</i>
<br />Space, which is the fundament of all that seems to exist, is a dimensionless non-existence that requires no measurements nor any measurers. Any measurment only serves the measurers.

True or false.

Meta
rgrace@rgrace.org
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

1) Space is not <i>non-existence</i>. Anything which occupies a location in the Universe "exists". It is inert, it does not seem to offer resistance to motion, it may (or may not) be colorless...if not colorless then it may be of an almost non-detectable red tint...LOL[]

2) It is not dimensionless. It covers the gamut of polar coordinates in all directions.

Your premise is FALSE