The Theory of Invariance

Actualy I wanted to copy and paste some paragraphs from Invariance but I don't know how to display math symbols here.

And these are some things which may be interested:

Linear momentum P = dE/dv.

Gravitational mass m<font size="1">g</font id="size1"> = dP/dv.

Mass - Energy Equivalence: E = m<font size="1">g</font id="size1">c^2.

No blackhole exists.

Velocity is not limited.

Space and time are invariant.

Principle of Equivalence is not true: Acceleration a # Gravitation g; Gravitational mass m<font size="1">g</font id="size1"> # Inertial mass m<font size="1">i</font id="size1">

---

And it is not a website at all. It is just a small simple blog. So please don't think that I advertise it.

Thank you so much,

I can copy first couple paragraphs:

---

Foreword:

&lt;&lt;
While studying the Theory of Relativity, I came up with some thoughts which are presented in this booklet as the Theory of Invariance. Although the Ship Invariance is also sailed with two postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity, she will carry us to a distinctive world: The World of Invariance.

I hope that this beautiful world is not far away from the reality.

Thank you so much for taking a journey on the Ship Invariance,

&gt;&gt;

I. Postulates

&lt;&lt;

Theory of Invariance is written based on two postulates:

1. The laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion relative to one another.

2. The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or of the motion of the source of the light.

Later, we will see how the theory named Theory of Invariance.

&gt;&gt;

---

The author of the theory say that he start it base on the two postulates of SR. This thing might be very interested: <b><i>There are two different theories from the same postulates? How?</i></b>

Hi Larry Burford,

Could I show the address of the blog Invariance now?

[] [] []

Cindy,

Thank you for providing us with a summary of something you think we might be interested in. Now that you have done so it is OK to show us how to get there.

I suggest, however, that you spend a little more effort describing what is there and particularly describing why you think we might be interested. We see a lot discussions, right here, about SR and what is wrong with it, or alternatives to it. Frankly, we do not pay very much attention to them, except to make sure they stay on topic and don't advertise. And that the poster does not attack anyone personally.

Most of these discussions make the same mistakes over and over. It is interesting, sometimes, to see a new member make an old mistake in a new way.

Good Luck,
LB

<b>[Cindy] "There are two different theories from the same postulates? How?"</b>

Hidden (unstated) postualtes, most likely. In truth it is just about impossible to make a complete list of all the assumptions, conscious or not, that a person or group might make as they construct an idea.

===

Also, the more time you spend using inductive logic (reasoning from an observation or a assumption BACKWARD to what might might have caused it) the more likely you are to uncover multiple explanations. Dedcutive logic (reasoning from from an observation or assumprion FORWARD to its logical conclusion), on the other hand almost always leads you to a unique explanation.

We tend to use induction much more often than deduction, because deduction is not as easy and is sometimes not even available. Induction is the kind of logic that law enforcers use to put evidence (observations) together and reason back to what and especially who caused that evidence to be where it was.

The big problem with induction, as I mentioned, is that it <b>rarely produces a unique</b> explanation. In forensic investigations this is how we end up convicting the wrong person so often. The Good Guys induce an explanation (and a culprit) that nicely explains the evidence they have and then stop looking.

The other explanations (and culprits) that also match the evidence are never examined.

LB

Thank Larry,

I invite you and all members to step on the Ship Invariance to begin a journey into the beautiful distinctive World Invariance.

The ship is here:

h**p://theoryofinvariance.blogspot.com/

Cindy,