- Thank you received: 0
Big Bang and Alternatives
- Larry Burford
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
19 years 3 months ago #14263
by Larry Burford
Reply from Larry Burford was created by Larry Burford
Cindy,
From the home page on this site go to the Cosmology tab. There is another cosmology tab when you get there (it is the default) and on that page there are several articles on the BB.
Most of us here do not think the BB is a viable theory.
Regards,
LB
From the home page on this site go to the Cosmology tab. There is another cosmology tab when you get there (it is the default) and on that page there are several articles on the BB.
Most of us here do not think the BB is a viable theory.
Regards,
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 3 months ago #14204
by Cindy
Replied by Cindy on topic Reply from
Do they try to establish a relation between red shift and age or between red shift and mass of stars, don't they ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 3 months ago #14207
by PhilJ
Replied by PhilJ on topic Reply from Philip Janes
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 3 months ago #14208
by JMB
Replied by JMB on topic Reply from Jacques Moret-Bailly
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
Most of us here do not think the BB is a viable theory.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Unhappily the most renowned astrophysicists do not think so !
Every day , the users of optical fibres and other laser sets observe frequency shifts by light-matter interactions, without blur of the images and the spectra, but the use of their theories of light-matter interactions is forbidden because all people who describe strange, marvelous, mysterious effects in the Universe would lose their credibility.
The last "discovery" is the "anomalous acceleration" of the Pioneer probes beyond 5 UA.
No more evolution in biology, incoherent physics, ... Back to the middle ages !
Most of us here do not think the BB is a viable theory.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Unhappily the most renowned astrophysicists do not think so !
Every day , the users of optical fibres and other laser sets observe frequency shifts by light-matter interactions, without blur of the images and the spectra, but the use of their theories of light-matter interactions is forbidden because all people who describe strange, marvelous, mysterious effects in the Universe would lose their credibility.
The last "discovery" is the "anomalous acceleration" of the Pioneer probes beyond 5 UA.
No more evolution in biology, incoherent physics, ... Back to the middle ages !
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 years 3 months ago #14218
by Cindy
Replied by Cindy on topic Reply from
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Larry Burford</i>
<br />Cindy,
From the home page on this site go to the Cosmology tab. There is another cosmology tab when you get there (it is the default) and on that page there are several articles on the BB.
Most of us here do not think the BB is a viable theory.
Regards,
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
If BB is not a right answer, then what is preventing galaxies from getting closer each other under effect of gavity ?
<br />Cindy,
From the home page on this site go to the Cosmology tab. There is another cosmology tab when you get there (it is the default) and on that page there are several articles on the BB.
Most of us here do not think the BB is a viable theory.
Regards,
LB
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
If BB is not a right answer, then what is preventing galaxies from getting closer each other under effect of gavity ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry Burford
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
19 years 2 months ago #14221
by Larry Burford
Replied by Larry Burford on topic Reply from Larry Burford
[Cindy] " ... what is preventing galaxies from getting closer each other under effect of gavity ?"
Gravity, of course.
Suppose that Newton/Einstein are correct and gravity's range is infinite. In a universe of infinite extent (most of us here take this as a given) there will be equal amounts of mass in all directions so the net gravitational force on a particular galaxy is zero. Except for the occasional chance collision with another galaxy.
But most of us here lean toward Meta Model's concept of a limited range for the force of gravity. Once again net external force on a particular galaxy (absent collision) is zero.
LB
Gravity, of course.
Suppose that Newton/Einstein are correct and gravity's range is infinite. In a universe of infinite extent (most of us here take this as a given) there will be equal amounts of mass in all directions so the net gravitational force on a particular galaxy is zero. Except for the occasional chance collision with another galaxy.
But most of us here lean toward Meta Model's concept of a limited range for the force of gravity. Once again net external force on a particular galaxy (absent collision) is zero.
LB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.269 seconds